Author Topic: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.  (Read 13233 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LadyTudorRose

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« on: January 17, 2009, 03:53:06 PM »
I dunno if you've ever heard of this crazy woman named Elizabeth Kelman who claims to be the daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. She doesn't have any proof for this claim, but apparently God told her in a dream so she set up a website.


http://www.we3.org/

She's obviously off her rocker and the best part is that she doesn't believe in DNA. She used to be a major Anna Anderson supporter, IIRC and she's well known for going onto forums and website guestbooks. A friend of a friend used to own a Princess Diana site and this woman spammed his guestbook so much he deleted the whole feature. She also used to have a guestbook but it crashed after people she'd spammed tried to get revenge on her. 

aleksandr pavlovich

  • Guest
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2009, 05:06:29 PM »
Attention Jeniann:  I am reacting SOLEY to your utilization of the word "Imperial."  Perhaps you are not aware that from 1876 to 1947,  the United Kingdom's sovereign was also "Emperor/Empress of India", thus was "Imperial" as well?  So the word "Imperial" is appropriate to THEIR title/s during that time period, which encompasses the very short reign of HM King Edward VIII.  In his "Instrument of Abdication", he renounced   "..... the Throne for Myself and My descendants."  (Obviously, I understand that you are in actuallity referring to the RUSSIAN Imperial title.)    Regards,  AP
« Last Edit: January 17, 2009, 05:38:29 PM by aleksandr pavlovich »

Offline Vecchiolarry

  • Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 760
    • View Profile
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2009, 05:39:08 PM »
Hi,

So, she doesn't believe in DNA - - how convenient!!
DNA does have a tendancy to muddy up the scenarios of these nutcases, doesn't it??...
And, especially since God told her in a dream - - well now, that's religion;  and religion and science don't always mix well....

Larry

Offline Douglas

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 1207
    • View Profile
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2009, 11:40:01 PM »
Oh my gosh, this is tremendous.  For we now know why Queen Mary refused to meet Wallis.  This was because she was too embarrassed to be seen with her son's preggers lover Wallis.  Absolutely this is fact.

The topper is that Elizabeth Kelmans grandson is the spitting image of Queen Mary.   I suggest the lad be costumed in one of Mary's regal outfits to echo the tableau of this mirror image.

Forget the DNA issue.  We all know that God can change DNA if He so desires.  So a DNA test of Elizabeth's husband and her children would of course be totally bogus.  Even a wise  jury a' noir in Los Angeles threw out some silly DNA test in a famous murder trial.  Yes, Larry, DNA is so yesterday.

I do so wish that Her Imperial Highness would descend to us and join our Claimants Thread with all the other imperials du jour.  Sorry, other claimants but we must make room for the real deal in this case.

I had a dull day here at the palace but this news really perked  things up.  I advise everyone to read that website that Jeniann so graciously hot linked.

Douglas
« Last Edit: January 17, 2009, 11:54:20 PM by Douglas »

Offline Lucien

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 7342
  • Courtier
    • View Profile
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2009, 12:06:41 AM »
Oh my gosh, this is tremendous.  For we now know why Queen Mary refused to meet Wallis.  This was because she was too embarrassed to be seen with her son's preggers lover Wallis.  Absolutely this is fact.

The topper is that Elizabeth Kelmans grandson is the spitting image of Queen Mary.   I suggest the lad be costumed in one of Mary's regal outfits to echo the tableau of this mirror image.

Forget the DNA issue.  We all know that God can change DNA if He so desires.  So a DNA test of Elizabeth's husband and her children would of course be totally bogus.  Even a wise  jury a' noir in Los Angeles threw out some silly DNA test in a famous murder trial.  Yes, Larry, DNA is so yesterday.

I do so wish that Her Imperial Highness would descend to us and join our Claimants Thread with all the other imperials du jour.  Sorry, other claimants but we must make room for the real deal in this case.

I had a dull day here at the palace but this news really perked  things up.  I advise everyone to read that website that Jeniann so graciously hot linked.

Douglas

Hmm,you are not your usual self are you?Thought your initials started with D.N.A.? ::)
Je Maintiendrai

Offline Michael HR

  • Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
  • Imperial Corps Des Pages
    • View Profile
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2009, 06:26:57 AM »
What a laugh! She must think we are all very stupid?
Remembering the Imperial Corps Des Pages - The Spirit of Imperial Russia


Offline Vecchiolarry

  • Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 760
    • View Profile
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2009, 11:08:15 AM »
Yes Douglas,

Might I advise that the grandson practise the Queen Mary wave to really make it believable.

Might I dare to say that I love your posts - refreshing and hilarious and my what a tonic!!!

Cheers,
Larry

Offline imperial angel

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
    • View Profile
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #7 on: January 18, 2009, 12:20:15 PM »
Oh my gosh, this is tremendous.  For we now know why Queen Mary refused to meet Wallis.  This was because she was too embarrassed to be seen with her son's preggers lover Wallis.  Absolutely this is fact.

The topper is that Elizabeth Kelmans grandson is the spitting image of Queen Mary.   I suggest the lad be costumed in one of Mary's regal outfits to echo the tableau of this mirror image.

Forget the DNA issue.  We all know that God can change DNA if He so desires.  So a DNA test of Elizabeth's husband and her children would of course be totally bogus.  Even a wise  jury a' noir in Los Angeles threw out some silly DNA test in a famous murder trial.  Yes, Larry, DNA is so yesterday.

I do so wish that Her Imperial Highness would descend to us and join our Claimants Thread with all the other imperials du jour.  Sorry, other claimants but we must make room for the real deal in this case.

I had a dull day here at the palace but this news really perked  things up.  I advise everyone to read that website that Jeniann so graciously hot linked.

Douglas

I was really laughing- although the lady is a laugh in her own right.

Offline Olga Maria

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 2125
  • 1 Corinthians 13, Mark 11: 23-24, Romans 8: 38-39
    • View Profile
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2009, 11:54:48 PM »
Oh my guh! And she used to be Anna Anderson's fan! No wonder she'd also do the same but in a different family.

Amazing colored fotos  by the most wonderful Yelena Aleksandrovna. Endless thank you very much!

Lady Nikolaievna

  • Guest
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2010, 10:15:29 PM »
LOL

Offline Michael HR

  • Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 645
  • Imperial Corps Des Pages
    • View Profile
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #10 on: July 25, 2010, 05:27:09 AM »
Dear me does it never end...
Remembering the Imperial Corps Des Pages - The Spirit of Imperial Russia


Offline TimM

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 1866
    • View Profile
    • Rex and Hannah Chronicles Wikia
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #11 on: August 23, 2010, 03:22:08 PM »
No, it doesn't.  You'll always have these nuts, no matter what evidence you can present.
Cats: You just gotta love them!

Offline Carolath Habsburg

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4833
  • As seen on TUMBLR!
    • View Profile
    • Victorian & edwardian roleplay in spanish!
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2010, 08:42:07 AM »
Sure, causr they had their "Real evidence" that they actually "are" part of of some royal family.

Thats called "mythomania", when a person lies and lies and start to believe his own lies.

Courtesy of Grand Duchess Ally

"...Пусть он землю бережет родную, А любовь Катюша сбережет....". Grand Duchess Ekaterina Fyodorovna to Grand Duke Georgiy Alexandrovich. 1914

Join the cause "We want an Ignore button

Offline TimM

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 1866
    • View Profile
    • Rex and Hannah Chronicles Wikia
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2010, 03:40:42 PM »
Quote
when a person lies and lies and start to believe his own lies.

Sounds like a politician.
Cats: You just gotta love them!

Offline Carolath Habsburg

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4833
  • As seen on TUMBLR!
    • View Profile
    • Victorian & edwardian roleplay in spanish!
Re: Not an IMPERIAL claimant... but nuts all the same.
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2010, 03:45:22 PM »
xDDDD!! well kind of! ;-D

Courtesy of Grand Duchess Ally

"...Пусть он землю бережет родную, А любовь Катюша сбережет....". Grand Duchess Ekaterina Fyodorovna to Grand Duke Georgiy Alexandrovich. 1914

Join the cause "We want an Ignore button