Kerensky on Alexandra - question

Last night I found myself in a (greek) forum reading about Alexandra and Rasputin (I'll try to translate as good as I can):

... ''but might there be something wrong with the tsarina (Alexandra) herself? Because what could possibly mean what Kerensky said about her: ''the true history about her private life never came, and will probably never come to light''

and also: ''some personal, completely private incident influenced Alexandra so much as to completely change her''

and: ''Chemodurov said something about some terrible sin that was punished, right after (he came to know of) the murder of the imperial family''

http://www.freeforums.gr/index.php/topic,3390.0.html

Since I have not read anything about the above statements of Kerensky I'd like to ask any of you who have to comment on the above.

hmmm... sounds a bit weird, I have no idea what sort of terribly UNKNOWN sin they are talking about... Well, maybe they just meant her bad influence on Nicky and the politics? That starts to be interesting...

[Mathematic, art and history in ♥]

Does it have something to do with burned correspondence with Ana Vyrubova she shared, or something with Rasputin? In 1917, chaos broke out -- and all former friends became enemies to the IF, not mentioning Tsarina Alexandra accusations.

http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/kerensky/1927/catastrophe/ch12.htm

It is so interesting that having read many books on Nicholas and Alexandra to see where some of the quotes about them came from.  Of course one would need to read Kerensky in order to know more about the Provisional Government and the captivity of the Emperor and Empress at Tsarskoe Selo.



http://www.freeforums.gr/index.php/topic,3390.0.html  This link doesn't work for me.