The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
 
 User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
May 22, 2013, 07:53:17 AM
449365 Posts in 8707 Topics by 8186 Members
Latest Member: shvic300
News: We think Pallasart is the best web design company in Austin and for good reason - they make this forum possible! Looking for a website? Call them at 512 469-7454.
+  The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
|-+  Discussions about the Imperial Family and European Royalty
| |-+  The Tudors (Moderators: Kimberly, Prince_Lieven, BobAtchison, Forum Admin)
| | |-+  Tudor costumes
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author
Topic: Tudor costumes  (Read 5387 times)
« on: April 29, 2010, 12:39:50 PM »
Constantinople
Guest

lets discuss what you like and disllike about Tudor costumes.  What do you like and dislike and what would you wear and not wear.
Logged
Reply #1
« on: April 29, 2010, 01:26:33 PM »
Kimberly Offline
Moderator
Velikye Knyaz
*****
Loyaulte me lie Posts: 3052

View Profile

Love the little French Hoods with the veil flowing behind. .......Couldnot bear to wear the wooden (yes, they were wooden) corsets.
Logged

Member of the Richard III Society
Reply #2
« on: April 29, 2010, 08:11:19 PM »
Constantinople
Guest

were they wooden stays or wood corsets?
Logged
Reply #3
« on: April 30, 2010, 12:30:08 AM »
Kimberly Offline
Moderator
Velikye Knyaz
*****
Loyaulte me lie Posts: 3052

View Profile

Corsets, they were stiffened with buckram and also wood was used to flatten out the lumps and bumps.
I would imagine that the starched ruff would be a bit itchy and uncomfortable as well.
Logged

Member of the Richard III Society
Reply #4
« on: April 30, 2010, 03:26:57 AM »
Kalafrana Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Posts: 2144

View Profile

Having a sensitive skin, I itch at the mere thought of those starched ruffs!

And being a fastidious soul I am concerned that all these garments were probably not washed very often.

Ann
Logged
Reply #5
« on: April 30, 2010, 03:30:03 AM »
Constantinople
Guest

yo uare right and the attraction for developing the colour peuce was that it hid fleas and body lice. 
Logged
Reply #6
« on: April 30, 2010, 05:33:45 AM »
Kimberly Offline
Moderator
Velikye Knyaz
*****
Loyaulte me lie Posts: 3052

View Profile

They wore linen under garments that would be boiled in lye but the beautiful gowns must have been a bit pongy because of the difficulties in cleaning the fabrics. My understanding is that "sweet smelling herbs" were burned close to the garments to refresh them.
Lavender was used to get rid of lice (along with nit combs- many were found in the wreck of the Mary Rose.
Slightly O/T but Mary de Guise was told to wash her hair only once a month when pregnant with Mary (Q of Scots).
Logged

Member of the Richard III Society
Reply #7
« on: April 30, 2010, 05:59:51 AM »
Constantinople
Guest

Ever since Christianity took over from healthy Roman values, bathing was seen as sinful so the church developed arguments  to argue against bathing dailly.  Society in general had a viceral and robust smell to it then.
Logged
Reply #8
« on: July 30, 2010, 07:52:21 PM »
TroubleTwin2 Offline
Boyar
**
Posts: 239

View Profile

I don't think it was bathing in entierty, I read somewhere that when they did bath they would avoid using warm water because they believed that it would let in evil spirits so they would use cold water. Now I read that a while ago, so I can't remember it word for word.
Logged
Reply #9
« on: July 30, 2010, 09:48:14 PM »
jehan Offline
Graf
***
Posts: 252

View Profile

Ever since Christianity took over from healthy Roman values, bathing was seen as sinful so the church developed arguments  to argue against bathing dailly.  Society in general had a viceral and robust smell to it then.

the truth is, as usual, complicated.  The church mainly spoke out against the bathhouses, which were seen as dens of sin (and they were in many cases!).

The main problem was practicality.  Bathing was difficult for the poorer classes, as heating water was expensive and time consuming, and bathtubs were expensive and rarely found in poorer homes.  Standards of cleanliness varied over times and countries- medieval people may have been cleaner than Renaissance people.  But hot (or warm) water was used- the surviving pictures often show fires in the background where water would have been heated.

Here are some contemporary pictures that show that bathing was not all that rare.  (sorry for the URL length- I don't know how to shorten them)

http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://racer.kb.nl/pregvn/MIMI/MIMI_76F21/MIMI_76F21_015R.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.larsdatter.com/baths.htm&usg=__E4M9C-ct3wlpOuekrpT_RXezf3M=&h=1140&w=750&sz=274&hl=en&start=0&tbnid=xFvS_SWpJNYW2M:&tbnh=162&tbnw=106&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmedieval%2Bmanuscripts%2Bbathing%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D799%26tbs%3Disch:10%2C114&um=1&itbs=1&iact=rc&dur=720&ei=5ahTTNyvLoH78Ab0sKn6Ag&page=1&ndsp=23&ved=1t:429,r:9,s:0&tx=78&ty=54&biw=1280&bih=799

http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://home.adelphi.edu/sbloch/ma/tents/pictures/Alexander/75r.tub.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.larsdatter.com/baths.htm&usg=__fDPu_rxyZ1dtfPTXXVDAR3MBJdo=&h=253&w=418&sz=33&hl=en&start=0&tbnid=YoFrc6Ipp1cNjM:&tbnh=128&tbnw=211&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmedieval%2Bmanuscripts%2Bbathing%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D799%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=rc&dur=601&ei=5ahTTNyvLoH78Ab0sKn6Ag&page=1&ndsp=23&ved=1t:429,r:0,s:0&tx=113&ty=43

http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1237/1152513115_6c22e4435b.jpg%3Fv%3D0&imgrefurl=http://flickr.com/photos/www_tripeleff_org/1152513115/&usg=__bYXD2f7ap9iKG-DlWhxfGShacCY=&h=387&w=500&sz=159&hl=en&start=0&tbnid=fu2j7M2Wb1F-1M:&tbnh=100&tbnw=130&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dmedieval%2Bmanuscripts%2Bbathing%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26sa%3DN%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26biw%3D1280%26bih%3D799%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=rc&dur=398&ei=06pTTLfpFcT68AbskbybBA&page=1&ndsp=23&ved=1t:429,r:4,s:0&tx=59&ty=51
Logged

Forget your perfect offering
There is a crack in everything
That's how the light gets in. 
(leonard Cohen)
Reply #10
« on: September 06, 2010, 12:46:44 AM »
katmaxoz Offline
Knyaz
****
I love YaBB 1G - SP1! Posts: 519

View Profile

I love the dresses...and here's a collection of images of them....

http://entertainment.webshots.com/album/569717763tcARIB

but I agree, they probably would have been smelly. Pomanders were popular for a good reason! There's a reasonable amount of guesswork in modern re-constructions of these dresses. For example, except for the shifts, corsets and support for the skirts, nobody is really sure about women's underwear for the period (imagine going to the toilet in these things - it boggles the mind)

To make these clothes for both men and women involved a consierable expense - especially when you add the cost of jewels to the outfit. Many people litrelly wore their wealth on their back or got themselves into considerable debt to keep up appearances at court.
Logged
Reply #11
« on: September 06, 2010, 02:22:38 PM »
Silja Offline
Knyaz
****
I love YaBB 1G - SP1! Posts: 600

View Profile

I love the dresses...and here's a collection of images of them....

http://entertainment.webshots.com/album/569717763tcARIB

. For example, except for the shifts, corsets and support for the skirts, nobody is really sure about women's underwear for the period

They didn't wear underwear though.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2010, 02:24:58 PM by Silja » Logged
Reply #12
« on: September 06, 2010, 03:45:26 PM »
katmaxoz Offline
Knyaz
****
I love YaBB 1G - SP1! Posts: 519

View Profile

I love the dresses...and here's a collection of images of them....

http://entertainment.webshots.com/album/569717763tcARIB

. For example, except for the shifts, corsets and support for the skirts, nobody is really sure about women's underwear for the period

They didn't wear underwear though.

that's the prevailing theory...but to be gross...how do you deal with things like periods without underwear for women at least? I suspect there was some underwear, jut not as common as in modern times.
Logged
Reply #13
« on: October 10, 2010, 01:29:01 PM »
boleynfan Offline
Newbie
*
Posts: 58

View Profile

Always loved the French hoods of the early Tudors and the snoods of the midcentury.  And love, love. love the rings on many fingers and the necklaces too.
Logged
Reply #14
« on: October 15, 2010, 09:18:25 AM »
MademoiselleAndrea Offline
Knyaz
****
Take me as you find me, all my fears and failures. Posts: 537

View Profile WWW

I love French hoods too. My favorite period of Tudor fashion is before the big farthingales, more early-mid century. Here's the link to the Tudor page of my fashion site: (it's not finished yet, though.)
http://pastalamode.webs.com/tudor.htm   Smiley
Logged

When I stand before God at the end of my life, I would hope that I would not have a single bit of talent left, and could say, "I used everything You gave me". --Erma Bombeck
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Website by Pallasart - Austin Web Design