The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
 
 User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
November 21, 2009, 01:05:51 AM
373818 Posts in 8567 Topics by 6997 Members
Latest Member: reya1986
News: Click here to return to the Main Alexander Palace Time Machine site http://www.alexanderpalace.org/palace/
+  The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
|-+  Discussions about the Imperial Family and European Royalty
| |-+  The Myth and Legends of Survivors (Moderators: LisaDavidson, Forum Admin, Alixz)
| | |-+  Claimants of Grand Duchess Tatiana Nicholaevna
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6 Go Down Print
Author
Sticky Topic Topic: Claimants of Grand Duchess Tatiana Nicholaevna  (Read 13453 times)
« on: December 16, 2004, 12:44:41 PM »
AGRBear Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
The road to truth is the best one to travel. Posts: 6256

View Profile WWW

Was it possible that it was Tatiana who survived?

AGRBear
« Last Edit: May 25, 2009, 08:01:38 PM by Alixz » Logged

"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152
Reply #1
« on: December 16, 2004, 12:45:34 PM »
AGRBear Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
The road to truth is the best one to travel. Posts: 6256

View Profile WWW

Quote
At the risk of going round an old loop for members I'm afraid Occleshaw's book does not bear serious examination.  A few points:

1/  Occleshaw has "Tatiana" flown out of Ekaterinberg by the British.  He doesn't explain how any aircraft got there or how it managed to then fly her to Vladivostok.  I have spoken at some length on this subject with the former editor of "Cross & Cockade International" and we are agreed there was no aircraft at the time could have feasibly done this.

2/ Occleshaw claims that records of the RAF contingent in North Russia 1918 (where he assumes the aircraft came from) are not released into the National Archive AIR1 papers and claims to have information they never will be.  He is correct in this - because they are in the AIR2 series and I have copies of them in my drawer.  Curiously they make no reference to a rescue mission.

3/ Occleshaw claims that Richard Meinertzhagen was working for a War Office section dealing with Intelligence on Russia - not according to the contemporary War Office List he wasn't.

4/ Occleshaw claims that a mysterious Miss Marguerite Lindsay who entered UK on 8 August 1918 on the same ship as Mrs Meinertzhagen was "Tatiana" as there is no record of her ever existing.  Those interested can trace her previous trans-atlantic journeys by looking her up on the Ellis Island web-site.  She seems to have travelled frequently prior to 1918.

5/ Occleshaw neglects to mention, in his excitement at finding Miss Lindsay arriving on the same ship as Mrs Meinertzhagen, that Richard meinertzhagen and his wife loathed each other like poison and their marriage was likely never consumated.  Mrs M is hardly the person he'd trust on a delicate mission.

Just a few of the fairly serious objections to Occleshaw's book which older members may have seen before.

Phil Tomaselli
Logged

"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152
Reply #2
« on: December 16, 2004, 12:51:13 PM »
AGRBear Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
The road to truth is the best one to travel. Posts: 6256

View Profile WWW

There is noted in some books that an airplane did fly over the Impatiev House and it's presents seem to distrub the CHEKA.

The RAF were not the only airplanes in the sky.  The Reds and the Whites had their own airplanes.

I've forgotten the URL but there is a site that talks about the WWI Aces and there is some on the Red and White air forces.  

I remember seeing in the Russian SF museum some photographs of the White Army pilots who were considered heroes.

Course,  I'm not saying that Occleshaw's story is how Tatiana escaped,  if she is the one who did,  I'm just adding to what Phil was saying.

AGRBear
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by AGRBear » Logged

"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152
Reply #3
« on: December 16, 2004, 05:09:25 PM »
Alice Offline
Graf
***
Posts: 280

View Profile

Quote
Was it possible that it was Tatiana who survived?

AGRBear


Yes, if umpteem American and Russian experts are wrong.

Otherwise, no.
Logged
Reply #4
« on: December 16, 2004, 06:37:28 PM »
Annie Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Posts: 4806

View Profile WWW

As with the the other sisters, there is a difference between 'missing' and 'survived.' A body is missing, but that doesn't necessarily mean she got away:(
Logged
Reply #5
« on: December 17, 2004, 10:15:12 PM »
Laura Mabee Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Art in Avatar done by Lisa! Posts: 1989

View Profile WWW

Hey guys, Livadia.org has a worked on a research paper with some others on this subject.

Here is the link:
http://www.livadia.org/missing/
Logged

Reply #6
« on: December 17, 2004, 11:05:36 PM »
LisaDavidson Offline
Moderator
Velikye Knyaz
*****
Posts: 2384

View Profile

I have always said that we will never be sure which sister is missing until we find the remains of the one who is missing. It could really be Tatiana, Marie, or Anastasia who is missing from the grave - but that does not mean that the missing sister survived.
Logged
Reply #7
« on: December 18, 2004, 08:01:58 PM »
Dandywell Offline
Boyar
**
Gospodi Pomilui Posts: 157

View Profile

If she did survive, which isn't likely, she wouldn't be alive now, unless she was 100+ yrs. old, so what is the point in pursuing such things if they only baffle annoy, stump, and over take our lives to no avail? Wink Not to force my opinions on anyone, or disappoint you in any way.
Logged

She stepped away from me and she moved through the fair,
And fondly I watched her move here and move there,
Then she went her way homeward with one star awake,
As the swan in the evening moves over the lake.
Reply #8
« on: December 19, 2004, 06:03:10 AM »
Olga Offline
Newbie
*
I love YaBB 1G - SP1! Posts: 0

View Profile

Quote
....so what is the point in pursuing such things if they only baffle annoy, stump, and over take our lives to no avail? Wink Not to force my opinions on anyone, or disappoint you in any way.


But Dandywell, you were on another thread trying to 'grab at straws' in an attempt to find out what happened.  Huh
Logged
Reply #9
« on: December 29, 2004, 10:58:42 AM »
AGRBear Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
The road to truth is the best one to travel. Posts: 6256

View Profile WWW

Quote
Hey guys, Livadia.org has a worked on a research paper with some others on this subject.
 
Here is the link:
http://www.livadia.org/missing/


I think Alia, Mikki & Lishka did a very well thought out web site.  
It's worth a visit.

AGRBear
Logged

"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152
Reply #10
« on: January 01, 2005, 01:28:52 PM »
Czarevna Colleen Offline
Newbie
*
Lady Lorna Dugal Posts: 92

View Profile

What differing opinions we all have!!!  (Of course, it just makes these discussions all the more interesting).  Thanks for the link, too.  I'll check it out.  In response to claims of Tatiana Nicolaievna surviving and Dr.  Michael Occleshaw's writings, I have my own views on the subject.  While I do believe that the House Of Windsor does know more than they have revealed about the fate of the Romanovs, and I do think it's possible that one or more of the family survived, I don't necessarily believe Occleshaw's theories.  The Lydd connection and grave of "Larissa Fedorovna" is interesting, and since the woman has no living relatives, I have to wonder if it would be permitted to exhume the grave and at least try to give them a DNA test at least to put that side of the story to rest.  There are many coincidences between Owen Tudor's first wife and the Grand Duchess Tatiana, and it is also an interesting point that three people who knew the Tudors positively identified a photograph of Tatiana as Larissa.  That aggravating photo from the Yorkshire newspaper "The Harrogate Harold" does add something to the mystery, since the picture cannot be improved due to the lack of negatives, and the fact that the person in question who resembles Tatiana is not named.

But some of the stories that Occleshaw collected around the time of the murders doesn't ring true.  For example, the testimony of Georgi Biron, supposed executioner of the family (funny, his name hasn't been mentioned in other accounts or books), about how the family was killed doesn't make sense, along with this bit of information:  Biron was quoted as saying, "Regarding Princess Tatiana Nicolaievna, she ran away or disappeared with the one of the Red Guards, long before this, perhaps even from Tobolsk."  Now, the photographs taken of the family while imprisoned in Tobolsk show Tatiana to be present in most of them, which doesn't necessarily mean anything, since we don't know exactly when the pictures were taken.  But, Pierre Guillard recalled seeing the rest of the children off to Ekaterinburg after the Czar, Czarina and Marie Nicolaievna had left, and he describes in clear and tearful detail as the children were trudging through the snow, and he saw Tatiana sink deeper and deeper into the mud, until she reached the transportation.  Also, the priests who performed the last religious service to the family on 14 July 1918 has claimed that the entire family was present.

There are many holes in the story regarding Meinertzhagen's diary account of rescuing one of the daughters, that many of you have mentioned here.  

I don't know what to think about the remains that were found, since so many have disputed the claim that they are the bodies of the Romanovs.  I have always believed that Anastasia surivived, but I am willing to keep an open mind.  There are just so many things about the accounts of the murders, disposal of the bodies, remains and survival claims that do not make sense or that are puzzling.  I hope one day it can all be put to rest. Huh Cry :-/
Logged
Reply #11
« on: January 01, 2005, 02:39:55 PM »
LisaDavidson Offline
Moderator
Velikye Knyaz
*****
Posts: 2384

View Profile

As I have stated in other threads, I think if highly unlikely that anyone survived. The leap in logic between two missing bodies to anyone surviving is enormous. Of course it is possible that Tatiana's body is missing. That would not necessarily mean Tatiana survived!
Logged
Reply #12
« on: January 01, 2005, 02:41:06 PM »
Lanie Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Posts: 1555

View Profile

Quote
As I have stated in other threads, I think if highly unlikely that anyone survived. The leap in logic between two missing bodies to anyone surviving is enormous. Of course it is possible that Tatiana's body is missing. That would not necessarily mean Tatiana survived!


Here, here, Lisa!  Of course, people like to think that missing bodies = survived, I have no clue WHY...
Logged
Reply #13
« on: January 02, 2005, 06:07:16 AM »
Alice Offline
Graf
***
Posts: 280

View Profile

Quote
Here, here, Lisa!  Of course, people like to think that missing bodies = survived, I have no clue WHY...


You mean the two that are missing didn't run away and join the circus?!  Cheesy
Logged
Reply #14
« on: January 02, 2005, 11:04:38 AM »
AGRBear Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
The road to truth is the best one to travel. Posts: 6256

View Profile WWW

Quote
.... [in part]....
For example, the testimony of Georgi Biron, supposed executioner of the family (funny, his name hasn't been mentioned in other accounts or books), about how the family was killed doesn't make sense, along with this bit of information:  Biron was quoted as saying, "Regarding Princess Tatiana Nicolaievna, she ran away or disappeared with the one of the Red Guards, long before this, perhaps even from Tobolsk."
.....


Where did you read about Georgi  Biron?  You were talking about "stories that Occleshaw collected", was this one???

AGRBear

PS  As long as two bodies are missing, one can only speculate what happen to them.  To speculate doesn't mean just thinking of theories of where they were buried, speculation can, and does, include a possible escape for one or both children of Nicholas II.


PSS Joining a circus is exactly how one of my relatives did escape so who knows,  truth can sometimes be stranger than fiction.

PSSS  Could Occleshaw story about Tatiana been in error and  it was not Tatiana who ran away but Maria?  According to  King and Wilson,  it was Maria and one of the guards who seem to be having some kind of romance.  Evdience was because of a birthday cake and their absence....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by AGRBear » Logged

"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Sponsored by Pallasart Austin Web Design