The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
 
 User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
May 21, 2013, 06:22:01 AM
449336 Posts in 8707 Topics by 8187 Members
Latest Member: shvic300
News: We think Pallasart is the best web design company in Austin and for good reason - they make this forum possible! Looking for a website? Call them at 512 469-7454.
+  The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
|-+  Discussions about the Imperial Family and European Royalty
| |-+  The Tudors (Moderators: Kimberly, Prince_Lieven, BobAtchison, Forum Admin)
| | |-+  Anne Boleyn's Downfall
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] Go Down Print
Author
Topic: Anne Boleyn's Downfall  (Read 12220 times)
Reply #60
« on: March 23, 2006, 10:33:52 AM »
imperial angel Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Posts: 4609

View Profile

I had read earlier in the thread, that it wasn't deformed, but that to Tudor eyes it may have seemed so, and this might have troubled Henry who might have sincerely believed that it was deformed. I think it may have played a part, but there were other factors more important.
Logged
Reply #61
« on: March 23, 2006, 11:57:32 AM »
Kimberly Offline
Moderator
Velikye Knyaz
*****
Loyaulte me lie Posts: 3052

View Profile

I doubt very much wether Henry saw this child, it would have been wrapped up and discretely removed from sight almost immediately
Logged

Member of the Richard III Society
Reply #62
« on: March 26, 2006, 10:46:59 AM »
Elisabeth Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Posts: 2131

View Profile

Yes, Kimberly, and I have to wonder - perhaps someone has mentioned this already, but I missed it - wouldn't the midwives called in to attend Queen Anne have been experienced in dealing with miscarriages of this type? Wouldn't they have regarded any so-called deformity of the fetus as in fact natural to this length of gestation? Why would they have raised the alarm over this particular pregnancy? It must have seemed totally normal to them, except that it ended in a miscarriage.

I have to admit I like Retha Warnicke's book a lot, but more for its emphasis on the Boleyn family's "affinities" to other powerful families than for the witchcraft stuff. I actually thought the author would have been far better off in scholarly terms if she'd stuck to the impact of family politics on Anne and left out the titillating witchcraft, deformed fetus business all together. But maybe that's what keeps the book in print?
Logged

... I love my poor earth
because I have seen no other

-- Osip Mandelshtam
Reply #63
« on: March 26, 2006, 11:13:00 AM »
Kimberly Offline
Moderator
Velikye Knyaz
*****
Loyaulte me lie Posts: 3052

View Profile

I haven't read Retha Warnicke's book,guess thats's another one for my list. The court midwives would have dealt with miscarriages on a very regular basis, due to the lack of "proper" ante-natal care. They would inspect and recognise foetal deformities without doubt.
Logged

Member of the Richard III Society
Reply #64
« on: March 26, 2006, 08:16:25 PM »
imperial angel Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Posts: 4609

View Profile

I have never read that book, although it is often such sensationlism that keeps such books in print, although it is usally better if they stick to the facts. Anyway, I agree with what everybody else says that most likely Henry never saw this, and it seemed normal to the midwives at the time. After all, they had lots of experience. If not, perhaps he heard reports of it, but whatever, I doubt he saw it. I ought to read that book, it sounds kind of ''out there''.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Website by Pallasart - Austin Web Design