The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
 
 User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
May 19, 2013, 05:10:24 PM
449284 Posts in 8705 Topics by 8187 Members
Latest Member: shvic300
News: We think Pallasart is the best web design company in Austin and for good reason - they make this forum possible! Looking for a website? Call them at 512 469-7454.
+  The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
|-+  Discussions about the Imperial Family and European Royalty
| |-+  The Tudors (Moderators: Kimberly, Prince_Lieven, BobAtchison, Forum Admin)
| | |-+  The Virgin Queen?
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] Go Down Print
Author
Topic: The Virgin Queen?  (Read 23849 times)
Reply #165
« on: November 24, 2006, 10:46:55 AM »
ferngully
Guest

as the kings wife, she could have been. if she was a queen in her own right without a husband, she could reign supreme, with no man to worry about and no mistress to compete with. who wanted to end up like any of henry's wives, especially anne boleyn?
Logged
Reply #166
« on: November 24, 2006, 04:41:28 PM »
imperial angel Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Posts: 4609

View Profile

She might not have been disposed of, but she would have had less power. So, in a sense that is disposed of. Wink Another point, I can think of is that in the Tudor age, politics was very turbulent. So she might have feared something politically would happen badly for her if she married the wrong person. After all, Mary, Queen of Scots was in a sense disposed of, and she was a queen.
Logged
Reply #167
« on: November 25, 2006, 01:03:09 AM »
ilyala Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
il y a Posts: 2071

View Profile

She might not have been disposed of, but she would have had less power. So, in a sense that is disposed of. Wink Another point, I can think of is that in the Tudor age, politics was very turbulent. So she might have feared something politically would happen badly for her if she married the wrong person. After all, Mary, Queen of Scots was in a sense disposed of, and she was a queen.

mary was disposed of but not by her husband but rather because of her husband. however, i find it hard to believe elizabeth would have ever thought of marrying a man suspected of murder (see robert dudley - i think the minute his wife died a suspicious death, any hopes of him marrying elizabeth died out).
Logged

'loving might be a mistake, but it's worth making'
ilya

Reply #168
« on: November 26, 2006, 05:35:53 PM »
imperial angel Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Posts: 4609

View Profile

Well, Elizabeth could also have been desposed because of her husband, and actually I find this more likely. Had she made an unpopular foriegn marriage, that might have been the end for her. But, then she was well aware of it. As for Leicester, I think she may have wanted to marry him, but never really entertained the idea seriously. She was much too clever to marry anybody, even someone she deeply loved, such as him. Had she been in a less exalted position, I think she might have married him, though.
Logged
Reply #169
« on: May 10, 2007, 02:42:09 AM »
Mari Offline
Knyaz
****
Posts: 998

View Profile

I wish I had joined this site and been able to participate in this discussion earlier. I don't have time to research any of this now but when I had a University History Class Dr. McGee in English History Class stated that Contemporaries knew that Queen Elizabeth lived openly with Lord Robert Dudley. He explained they had connecting rooms. Now that might not contribute to the "Virginity question" but I wonder if anyone has heard this and knows of a source. He also claimed that she never conceived because of a crooked womb or uterus. Anyone ever heard that?
Logged
Reply #170
« on: May 10, 2007, 04:25:34 AM »
Kimberly Offline
Moderator
Velikye Knyaz
*****
Loyaulte me lie Posts: 3052

View Profile

I always thought that Elizabeth requested for there to be no post mortem and that that request was honoured. If this is true then there is no way he can know that she had a "crooked uterus". Undecided
Logged

Member of the Richard III Society
Reply #171
« on: May 10, 2007, 11:46:51 PM »
Mari Offline
Knyaz
****
Posts: 998

View Profile

I think it was more of an exam when Queen Elizabeth was alive...Dr. McGee was a an elderly Professor and now is dead or I would ask him for the source.
 I would like to know where the uterus story came from also.
Anyone?  Roll Eyes
good to know about the post mortem


Logged
Reply #172
« on: May 11, 2007, 06:00:50 AM »
Helen_Azar Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Ask about my upcoming book on Grand Duchess Olga Posts: 7252

View Profile WWW

Didn't they do an internal exam on Elizabeth before she was going to marry Alencon to see if she was capable of bearing children and pronounced that she was "like other women" and perfectly capable of having children? Which means that her uterus was just fine. I would like to know where the "crooked uterus" story came from too... Maybe the same place as the rumor that she was really a man?  Wink
Logged

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Website by Pallasart - Austin Web Design