The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
 
 User Info & Key Stats   
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
May 23, 2013, 12:12:55 PM
449395 Posts in 8708 Topics by 8187 Members
Latest Member: Karl-Heinz
News: We think Pallasart is the best web design company in Austin and for good reason - they make this forum possible! Looking for a website? Call them at 512 469-7454.
+  The Alexander Palace Time Machine Discussion Forum
|-+  Discussions about Russian History
| |-+  Imperial Succession and the Throne (Moderators: LisaDavidson, BobAtchison, Forum Admin)
| | |-+  What if....
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author
Topic: What if....  (Read 3502 times)
Reply #15
« on: August 22, 2005, 03:00:00 PM »
RomanovFan Offline
Knyaz
****
THE BIG PAIR, 1914 Posts: 576

View Profile

That makes sense to me, TampaBay. Royals are picky that way, I guess. Everyone has to be of an equal royal status or have an "English" last name.  Mountbatten is the English version of the surname, Battenburg, which was his mother's surname. (His mother Princess Alice, was a great-granddaughter of Queen Victoria.)
Logged

~LESLIE~

ROMANOV FAN SINCE 1997
Reply #16
« on: January 31, 2006, 05:03:53 PM »
Nadezhda Edvardovna Offline
Boyar
**
Posts: 118

View Profile

Actually, no.  The children of Elizabeth II and their descendants derive their rank from their grandfather, George VI who issued the English equivalent of a ukase (sorry, I can't think of the correct term just now, Letters Patent? maybe) endowing EII's children with the HRH and princely rank.  This happened during her first pregnancy (Charles) and was meant to prevent him from being born without rank.  Since the sovereign is the "fount of honour" in England, I assume that had George VI not done so, Elizabeth II by virtue of her sovereign status could have done so in her own right after she ascended the throne.  But it wasn't necessary.  Pax, Nadezhda.
Logged
Reply #17
« on: January 31, 2006, 09:13:37 PM »
Tsarfan Offline
Velikye Knyaz
****
Miss the kings, but not the kingdoms Posts: 1823

View Profile

Quote
Nikolai would (apologies about the harshness of this statement) have more than likely outlived Alexei, because of the nature of Alexei's medical condition, (which was a State secret).


Alexei's illness was not a state secret.  The main Alexander Palace website contains a newspaper article from 1912 reporting the history of hemophilia in Victoria's progeny and specifically mentioning Alexei as a sufferer.  (There is a lengthy thread on this Forum discussing just how widespread the knowledge was that Alexandra was a likely carrier even before her marriage and how common was the knowledge -- at least among the elite classes inside and outside of Russia -- of Alexei's hemophilia.)

I have no idea how the notion came about that Alexei's illness was a closely-guarded secret at the time, although the notion is certainly widely accepted these days.  My only guess is that no one dared speak openly about the illness during Nicholas' reign, because of his and Alexandra's determination to treat Alexei as heir -- and that reticence has subsequently been taken as lack of awareness.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 05:00:00 PM by Tsarfan » Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Website by Pallasart - Austin Web Design