Author Topic: Re: So who WAS she, then?  (Read 94459 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lanie

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 1533
    • View Profile
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #630 on: May 08, 2005, 10:17:25 PM »
Quote
I've been sick of them for a very long time :(

(note the term 'jihadist' in his last post- is that not an insult?) :P


I jus take it all lightly with a grain of salt, the only way to stay sane.  So we can joke about being DNA terrorists now.  :-*

Mgmstl

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #631 on: May 09, 2005, 02:14:32 AM »
Quote
I've been sick of them for a very long time :(

(note the term 'jihadist' in his last post- is that not an insult?) :P


Somebody must be very bored, since they can't get an argument they try to bait & start them by responding to month old posts..... NEXT :o :o :o

Offline Annie

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4757
    • View Profile
    • Anna Anderson Exposed!
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #632 on: May 09, 2005, 06:48:16 AM »
Quote

Somebody must be very bored, since they can't get an argument they try to bait & start them by responding to month old posts..... NEXT :o :o :o


Did you bother to notice it was Michelle who bumped the thread?

Offline Annie

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4757
    • View Profile
    • Anna Anderson Exposed!
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #633 on: May 09, 2005, 06:51:09 AM »
Quote
Yes, Micheal, I'm sick of the insults too.  >:(


See, this is what I responded to, note the date and time, bumped yesterday, before my post. So you see Michael, your comment was inaccurate and pointless.

Offline etonexile

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 1231
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
    • View Profile
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #634 on: May 09, 2005, 07:35:11 AM »
Quote
No Jeremy, things are fine today, why do you ask? ::)

I just come back to find the DNA jihadists referring to people that don't believe as the do, as crazy, a little off the beam, etc...So I just fire back a few rounds to keep things in order, that's all.   ;D ;D


DNA science is a relatively new technique....some folk don't understand it and can't quite accept it...not unlike the ferment over finger printing in the late 19th century.We now generally understand this process and accept it as evidence. DNA will be better understood and accepted by the public with time...

I hope we can all behave as ladies and gentlemen in this wonderful forum....

Mgmstl

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #635 on: May 09, 2005, 08:20:07 AM »
Quote

See, this is what I responded to, note the date and time, bumped yesterday, before my post. So you see Michael, your comment was inaccurate and pointless.


No it wasn't inaaccurate & pointless, it was accurate and entirely to the point, as I saw Michelle "bumped" the thread, which of course didn't matter, but as usual you had to add more than your two cents worth in trying to stir the pot.   ::)

P.S.  I also KNEW you would be up early to stir it some more, and what your response would be.  I am suprised though that the term hate wasn't thrown in a few times for effect.  :)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Mgmstl »

Offline Annie

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4757
    • View Profile
    • Anna Anderson Exposed!
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #636 on: May 09, 2005, 09:17:15 AM »
Quote

No it wasn't inaaccurate & pointless, it was accurate and entirely to the point, as I saw Michelle "bumped" the thread, which of course didn't matter,


No, it was inaccurate and pointless, because you accused me of being 'bored' and digging up fights in old threads, while I was not the one who bumped the old thread making a rude comment. "Of course it doesn't matter" you say, well, that just proves your ignorant bias, that if someone is on your 'side' they can do no wrong, it must always be the sinister plot of someone who doesn't agree with you!



Quote
usual you had to add more than your two cents worth in trying to stir the pot.   ::)

P.S.  I also KNEW you would be up early to stir it some more, and what your response would be.  I am suprised though that the term hate wasn't thrown in a few times for effect.  :)


Right back at ya, buddy. Look in the mirror, you did it too!



Mgmstl

  • Guest
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #637 on: May 09, 2005, 09:33:08 AM »
Quote

No, it was inaccurate and pointless, because you accused me of being 'bored' and digging up fights in old threads, while I was not the one who bumped the old thread making a rude comment. "Of course it doesn't matter" you say, well, that just proves your ignorant bias, that if someone is on your 'side' they can do no wrong, it must always be the sinister plot of someone who doesn't agree with you!



Right back at ya, buddy. Look in the mirror, you did it too!






No it was accurate & concise in reference to you & to your motives as you had to chime in to start your usual round of stirring the pot.  If you are tired of the insults then my dear, my suggestion to you is to stop inciting the problem that leads to the insults.... Oh what playground responses: "I'm rubber you're glue..look in the mirror..."  

Get over yourself and your over dramatization of the issues here with this "sinister plot" garbage.  I see you stayed away from hate & hateful this time and are down to sinister, could it be that I just don't agree with you, and you can't accept that fact? This is just the same old garbage from you just to get something started.  I see that nothing will EVER change, so I am going back to ignoring you for the sake of what is best for this survivor thread. 8) 8)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Mgmstl »

Offline Annie

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4757
    • View Profile
    • Anna Anderson Exposed!
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #638 on: May 09, 2005, 10:09:37 AM »
Quote



No it was accurate & concise in reference to you & to your motives as you had to chime in to start your usual round of stirring the pot.  If you are tired of the insults then my dear, my suggestion to you is to stop inciting the problem that leads to the insults.... Oh what playground responses: "I'm rubber you're glue..look in the mirror..."  



HAHAHAHA!! Can't you see you are doing EXACTLY what you are accusing me of?! Who's stirring the pot? Who's fighting? Is it only me? Get real!


If I were FA I'd close this thread, not just because of this garbage, but because it's too long and takes too long to load and locks up some people's computers. (mine too)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Annie »

Offline AGRBear

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 6611
  • The road to truth is the best one to travel.
    • View Profile
    • Romanov's  Russia
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #639 on: May 09, 2005, 11:05:02 AM »
No more insults and DNA on this thread
:P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P :P

TOPIC PLEASE!

So, who WAS she, then?

If AA wasn't FS then who was she?



AGRBear
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by AGRBear »
"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152

Offline Forum Admin

  • Administrator
  • Velikye Knyaz
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • www.alexanderpalace.org
    • View Profile
    • Alexander Palace Time Machine
Re: So who WAS she, then?
« Reply #640 on: May 09, 2005, 11:15:48 AM »
Annie, I've said before if you think a thread is too long, start a new one yourself...I don't have to start all new threads...

but
THREAD LOCKED due to my zero tolerance policy for this personal attack garbage.  Y'all can thank Annie and Michael G for that.

FA