1
The Windsors / Re: Princess Louise, Duchess of Argyll
« on: October 14, 2007, 04:29:41 PM »
Just to check, are Beatrice and Helena with Louise in the wedding photo?
Mary R.
Mary R.
News:
We think Pallasart is the best web design company in Austin and for good reason - they make this forum possible! Looking for a website? Call them at 512 469-7454.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
The Windsors / Re: Edward and Sophie, Earl and Countess of Wessex
« on: September 09, 2007, 08:28:14 PM »
Edward bald would just be...bad for lack of a better word. It certainly suits some men, but I don't think Edward is one of them.
Mary R.
Mary R.
3
Having Fun! / Re: Your Ten Most Disliked Royals and why
« on: September 02, 2007, 10:09:35 PM »
How interesting! How did the mother know Queen Mary?
Mary R.
Mary R.
4
The Windsors / Re: Princess Beatrice of York
« on: August 28, 2007, 06:40:13 PM »
It's not you... I wouldn't be surprised if they did!
Mary R.
Mary R.
5
The Windsors / Re: Origins of Windsor Royal names
« on: August 26, 2007, 09:22:38 PM »
I'm sure Queen Mary would have seen it as a protective measure for the monarchy.
Mary R.
Mary R.
6
The Windsors / Re: The Coronations in XX-XXI cent.
« on: August 21, 2007, 09:14:15 PM »
You took the words right out of my mouth! Long may she reign!!
Mary R.
Mary R.
7
The Windsors / Re: The Coronations in XX-XXI cent.
« on: August 19, 2007, 11:02:06 PM »
I must agree with Grace, the coronation ceremony is here to stay. The coronation is indeed a rare event that involves the efforts of so many, it is an opportunity for national unity. People look forward to the display of pomp and ceremony. It's true in certain countries such as Norway the ceremony is radically simpler but the customs are different in those cases. Charles perhaps would want a simpler ceremony, I have read that he also wants a multi-faith service. Anyone's thoughts on that? And most importantly... God Save The Queen!
Mary R.
Mary R.
8
The Windsors / Re: Had there been no 'Camilla' - would the Wales marriage have survived?
« on: August 19, 2007, 07:46:10 PM »
Ah the irony...
Mary R.
Mary R.
9
The Windsors / Re: Queen Victoria's Family
« on: August 18, 2007, 07:10:36 PM »
I hope this belongs here. Anyone have a better version of this picture? Thanks!
Mary R.
Mary R.
10
The Windsors / Re: Had there been no 'Camilla' - would the Wales marriage have survived?
« on: August 17, 2007, 11:34:09 PM »
First off bravo for the topic suggestion, what stimulating discussion! Many previous posts have simply taken the words out of my mouth! I have mixed views, on one hand I would like to believe the marriage would have been strong etc. However, I also lean towards the idea that the marriage would still exist if for appearances only. Of course, there were so many factors it is rather difficult to tell what would have been.
Mary R.
Mary R.
11
The Windsors / Re: Re: Windsor Jewels Part 6
« on: August 17, 2007, 11:23:32 PM »
I can only imagine Queen Mary's reaction...
Mary R.
Mary R.
12
The Windsors / Re: Queen Alexandra (1844-1925), Part III
« on: August 16, 2007, 09:20:19 AM »
Your collection is so impressive! Thanks for sharing!
Mary R.
Mary R.
13
The Windsors / Re: Movies about the British Royal family
« on: August 16, 2007, 09:17:45 AM »
She would be a good choice! Would anyone be opposed to an American actress portraying the Duchess?
Mary R.
Mary R.
14
The Windsors / Re: Movies about the British Royal family
« on: August 15, 2007, 11:55:38 AM »
Any suggestions for the Duchess of Kent? 
Mary R.
Mary R.
15
The Windsors / Re: Movies about the British Royal family
« on: August 14, 2007, 06:41:11 PM »
I just checked IMDB and noticed that Miranda Richardson is to play the Duchess of Kent! 
Mary R.
Mary R.