Thank you Richard, for the specific charges against Nicholas. That was the point I was trying to make all along. Not just a trial because Nicholas commited crimes against the Russian people; so therefore he should have had a trial, so therefore he should be shot, just because some think he deserved it. Comments like that leave me thinking of the "trial" the Ceauescu's had in 1989. (Yes he and his wife commited crimes against the Romania people, and yes they should have had a proper trail, not a bullet in the head at the end of the day)
I am in no way justifing his actions during his reign because of the "Divine Right of Kings". Whether the Divine Right of Kings can be used in a trial, remains to be seen

Belchoka, thank you for posting the articles regarding war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Louise