Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Akira Takahashi

Pages: [1] 2
1
BeNeLux Royalty / Prince Frederik Has Died
« on: March 10, 2025, 02:28:34 PM »
Quote
Prince Frederik, the youngest son of Prince Robert of Luxembourg and Princess Julie of Nassau, left behind a lasting legacy following his death at age 22 this month.

The beloved royal died on March 1 from POLG Mitochondrial disease ? a rare genetic disorder that affects approximately one in 5,000 people.

The genetic disorder affects multiple organ systems and the mitochondria, the energy-producing parts of cells.

RIP. It makes me think a little of Alexei.

https://nypost.com/2025/03/10/entertainment/prince-frederik-of-luxembourgs-heroic-final-act-revealed-before-death-at-22/

2
Well, I’m going to go out on a limb here and give this film a very mixed review. There’s no question but that, as others have noted here, it’s visually stunning, a veritable feast for the eyes. The interior and exterior shots of the Alexander Palace are gorgeous, the sets and costumes are not only beautiful but also as historically accurate as possible (for example, Nicholas and Alexandra’s bedroom is recreated so faithfully that it is almost indistinguishable from photographs of the real thing posted here at the AP site). But that’s it for historical accuracy. The minute you start paying attention to what the characters are actually saying, you realize that what this film presents is not an episode of Russian history but a new Russian national myth about the last tsar and his family. ? 

I suspected this would be the case at the very beginning of the film, when we’re informed that, despite the loss of 2 million men at the front, in February 1917 the power and prestige of the imperial dynasty remained unaffected! Well, that’s news to me and to anyone else who’s ever read anything about the Russian Revolution. Not surprisingly, no mention is made here of Rasputin, recently murdered, or of his deleterious effect on the Romanovs’ reputation. Because as it turns out the Romanovs were "really" brought down not by their own actions or by the Russian people themselves but by the treacherous, lily-livered elite and a conspiracy of "outside" agitators. Thus the outbreak of protests in Petersburg is presented as peaceful and of no danger to the monarchy until two mysterious men (German agents? socialists?) are shown throwing a bomb into the middle of a demonstration. The implication being that the March Revolution was the handiwork of agents provocateurs, and not a "real" expression of the popular will.

Admittedly, maybe I missed something somewhere: my Russian is not what it used to be, so I didn’t always understand all the dialogue, not to mention the fact that the sound in this film is truly lousy – I had to turn the volume up to maximum to hear anything! But as the movie unfolded, my worst suspicions tended to be confirmed… More than once I caught a whiff of bad old Russian anti-Semitism. Didn’t anyone else notice how all the Moscow Bolsheviks had dark beards and long noses and looked suspiciously like every anti-Semite’s stereotypical idea of what a Jew should look like? Lenin conspiring with Sverdlov and Trotsky (!) to kill the Romanovs (no controversy here about who’s idea it actually was! Moscow was fully in charge)… meanwhile a devoted Russian soldier is giving his blood to save the tsarevich’s life… How symbolic!

Also note how the filmmakers are at great pains to show how very Russian the imperial family was… not only in their religious faith but also down to singing Russian romances together and dancing about to the strains of a balalaika (played by the devoted Russian soldier). It’s all beautifully done, of course, and very emotionally affecting, but somehow so manipulative, too, it kind of bothered me. For example, I didn’t understand why the grand duchesses’ hair still hadn’t grown out when over a year had passed since their heads were shaved, unless this was supposed to remind us subliminally of concentration camp victims… Then, cut from the brutal, bloody execution scene to the year 2000 and the ceremonial burial of the imperial family in the cathedral, with everyone in the congregation holding up images of the holy martyrs... I found myself with tears in my eyes… it was all so very effective! But in the end I’m still not quite sure how I feel about this movie. It left a bad taste in my mouth. Kind of like biting into a beautiful, juicy red apple and discovering it’s poisonous.

I finally got to see this movie and I say I have to agree with you. Visually, it was excellent, but everything about it is so white-washed. The politics were glossed over and the Romanovs portrayed as very saint-like. I disliked Alexei in particular. Anastasia had some personality, but it feels really toned down. I suppose that if you come at it from an Orthodox standpoint, it's a great film, but I didn't care for it that much.

Things were bad in Russia, and it was because the system just didn't work and Nicholas refused to reform it. It wasn't because of a few bad men instigating things, it was because Nicholas was an autocrat who responded to unrest with force of arms.

I thought it also did a poor job of showing how the family suffered during their captivity. I was reading "The Race to Save the Romanovs" and the telegrams going out about the royal family's living conditions painted a very different picture than we're shown here. The family was relying on money from the underground monarchists and the soldiers at Ekatrinburg were cruel, particularly to the four GDs. In this movie, there are a few rude soldiers, but until they all get killed at the end, everything seems quite pleasant. They're just such saintly people that they can't help but win everyone except the really bad guys over to their side!

3
Any word on Grif?s book?

I was just wondering that myself.

4
Anastasia Nicholaievna / Re: Anastasia Anecdotes
« on: December 28, 2024, 02:18:44 PM »
Great little story and thanks for sharing!

Quote
She can enliven any place she sets foot in by her uncontrollable, cheerful laughter.

How I would have loved to hear that laugh!

Me too, although Anastasia would've been someone I would've loved to meet and loathed to meet at the same time. While it sounds like she could make everyone laugh, I wouldn't want to be on her bad side. It sounds like she could be a downright terror! I know that as a GD she could get away with a lot, but I think if I had done half the things she did, I never would've seen the light of day again.

5
Who knew that if you disappeared for a while, the entire forum would basically be abandoned by the time you returned? Finally got around to reading The Race to Save the Romanovs and decided to hit up the site I was addicted to only to discover it's very empty around here.

Anyway, I don't know if you still post here, but this is an interesting concept. I knew that Anastasia was a bit different from her sisters in that she likely would've thrived very well had she been exiled from Russia following the Revolution. Doing 'normal' work probably wouldn't have bothered her, and she certainly would've done better for herself than the modern-day Prince Harry.

That being said, I never considered that she would be lonely. There are a lot of things I imagine she would've felt about her place in the family (I mean, her name is basically a sexist apology, 'Yes, it's another girl, but don't worry, the boy is coming!' type of a name), but I never thought of her as lonely in a world where she would've been surrounded by people. It makes sense, though.

6
Maria Nicholaievna / Re: Maria's Tonsil Operation
« on: November 25, 2024, 10:37:36 AM »
Tonsil operations were quite frequently done without anaesthetic as late as the 1920s - see Roald Dahl's book Boy.

As far as keeping the patient's mouth open when using ether or chloroform, I would imagine that technique was to give the patient enough to knock them out and then work fast!

Ann

I imagine they'd have to do something to keep it open, as the pain would instinctively make you want to close it! I imagine the Tsar's family would have access to it, though. I jumped down the rabbit hole and found this: https://www.speareducation.com/spear-review/2013/08/a-brief-history-of-dental-anesthesia

7
The Windsors / Re: Queen Elizabeth II Part IV
« on: September 10, 2022, 06:47:32 PM »
I haven't been here in forever, but may the queen rest in peace.  She was beloved and respected the world over.

8
I watched the animated film when I was a kid, and my class was so into it that my teacher dedicated a week to teaching us about the Imperial family and the Bolshevik Revolution, which instilled in me a love of Russian history.  Happily learning Russian now, largely thanks to that musical.  It's a lot different from Japanese, and while it's not as close to English as Norwegian, it's close enough to make comparisons.  They're both Indo-European, after all!

Anyway, back on topic, I'd love to see the stage adaptation despite the inaccuracies.  I think the worst Anastasia film was that weird one with the talking instruments, and I know it can't be that bad!  I listened to most of the soundtrack on YouTube and think it sounds pretty good, even without "In the Dark of the Night."

9
Which musical is this?  The broadway one?  I've listened to some of the songs, but I haven't gotten through the whole soundtrack yet.

10
Just started part one!

Feels great to be back on the forum, by the way...

11
I haven't been on in forever!

The animated Anastasia movie has been recently adapted for broadway.  The strangest thing is that Rasputin is not in it, and it's gunning for a little more historical accuracy than the film was.

Regardless, it looks like it'll be a great experience.

12
I just got the film and haven't watched anything but the special features (it's the collector's edition) and it looks great!  I'll have a better response once I've actually watched the film, though.

13
Off topic, but here's an interesting article regarding the real Von Trapp family.  http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2005/winter/von-trapps.html

That said, while I still love The Sound of Music, it's very apparent that Fiddler on the Roof is much closer to the truth.

14
Fiddler on the Roof is one of my favorite musicals, along with Camelot, The Sound of Music, and The Phantom of the Opera.  Each one of them is a classic in their own right, and many of them took the musical industry to new heights.  Well, maybe not Fiddler, but it's still a good story, and is true to the times.  It tells the story of the Jews much better than The Sound of Music tells the story of the Von Trapp family, and Fiddler is fictional!  And who can forget Tevye's dream?

15
oh, gosh Animaniacs. That was a good tv show :), a spin off of Animaniacs, called hysteria had the Russian Revolution song  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCln4UEUc0o

After searching everywhere, I found the entire episode here: http://www.truveo.com/The-Russian-Revolution/id/1678504493

Histeria was neat, although I always preferred Animaniacs.

Pages: [1] 2