Princess Beatrice clearly took the job of editing very seriously and very conscientiously. The journals are beautifully written & I have yet to come across a spelling mistake or a crossing out. Unfortunately what I presume are Princess Helena Victoria's entries are a real mess, so untidy with plenty of crossings out. Perhaps Beatrice was horrified (I know I would be!) and she didn't ask Helena Victoria again.
Almost any historian would have preferred a messy copy which kept a greater proportion of the originals intact; beautiful handwriting cannot compensate for what has been called a 'horrific act of literary vandalism' (Helen Rappaport in 'Queen Victoria: A biographical companion') which both Queen Victoria and King George protested.
What are you going on about? That's blatantly obvious.

Are you stating that Helena Victoria'ss entries kept a great proportion of the originals? If so how do you know this?
And in actual fact Queen Mary & King George did not protest, they felt unable to intervene, mores the pity.