Hi, I'm new here-
I just finished this book. I was disappointed as I found several inaccuracies in the book. Some of her information just seemed too unbelievable and her sources did not adequately explain to me where she came up with her ideas. I found some truth weaved in with some untruth. I am glad that this is not my first reading of this subject because if it had been, I would have been somewhat misled.
This would probably be somewhat more informative:
"The Ruin of a Princess" as told by the Duchesse d'Angouleme, Madame Elizabeth (sister of King Louis XVI), and Clery (the King's Valet de Chambre)
Translated by Katherine Prescott Wormeley (1912) New York, Lamb Publishing Co.
Thank You
I agree,i noticed the inaccuracies as well and am very disappointed! she made very stupid mistakes, madame du barry was stated to be 2 years older than Marie Antoinette. Madame Du Barry was born in 1743 and Marie Antoinette was born 1755. You do the math. as a historian i would think she'd know better. Also she says that duchesse de polianc and king louis xvi had an affair as it was a mere fact when it was just a rumor and no proof of their affair exists.