361
Olga Nicholaievna / Re: Tsarina Olga!?!?
« on: July 14, 2014, 02:41:28 PM »
Your right, I didn't think of my response clearly though, I posted it very quickly before bed.
Like you said Nicholas being a reformer is nothing but far from the truth but perhaps they thought Nicholas turned a corner and was slowly starting to become a reformer for the people. The government did become less reactionary and censorship was eased. Also between 1906 and 2011 Stolypin was making numerous reforms that needed to be made and people were cautiously optimistic about the course Russia was taking so who knows. I'm probably completely wrong though.
Your right about Michael being slightly more progressive then Nicholas and considering how likable and free spirited he appeared I'm surprised they would paint him as the anti-reformer. If anyone that close to the throne was really going to make Russia a constitutional monarchy it was Michael not Nicholas. I wouldn't trust the Vladimirs to do it either.
I'm guessing they also didn't think much of baby Alexei (his hemophilia wasn't that known yet) and that a regent government with him would be a disaster unless that's in the other snippet of the article. Either way the article appears to be ridiculous.
Like you said Nicholas being a reformer is nothing but far from the truth but perhaps they thought Nicholas turned a corner and was slowly starting to become a reformer for the people. The government did become less reactionary and censorship was eased. Also between 1906 and 2011 Stolypin was making numerous reforms that needed to be made and people were cautiously optimistic about the course Russia was taking so who knows. I'm probably completely wrong though.
Your right about Michael being slightly more progressive then Nicholas and considering how likable and free spirited he appeared I'm surprised they would paint him as the anti-reformer. If anyone that close to the throne was really going to make Russia a constitutional monarchy it was Michael not Nicholas. I wouldn't trust the Vladimirs to do it either.
I'm guessing they also didn't think much of baby Alexei (his hemophilia wasn't that known yet) and that a regent government with him would be a disaster unless that's in the other snippet of the article. Either way the article appears to be ridiculous.