Messages

1846

Tatiana Nicholaievna / Re: Anniversary of Tatiana's birthday -- post memorial messages & tributes here!

« on: June 10, 2005, 09:41:14 PM »

Happy birthay in Heavens, sweet Grand Duchess Tatiana! Be in peace with your whole family, my dear!  

RealAnastasia.

1847

Anastasia Nicholaievna / Re: Anastasia Pictures 2

« on: June 10, 2005, 09:36:03 PM »

Small but great! I've never see it , anyway and it's a wonderful photo!

RealAnastasia.

1848

The Myth and Legends of Survivors / Re: Were There Any Survivors? Two Bodies are Missing!

« on: June 10, 2005, 08:03:15 PM »

Dear AA supporter...We shall always speak about DNA in this form....it is science....Would you have us disregard finger print evidence?...Yes...as far as we know...2 bodies are missing....bad Bolshies...next time they hurriedly butcher people....they should be more methodical....

Well; speak about what you wanted to. But the only thing you have to said to all people who still believe in survivors is "DNA" and a serie of incoerents phrases plentyof "..." everywhere, between them (I'm not speaking about etonexile, for he is not the only one who does this. So don't apologize for yourself. Your opinion it's only a resume from other people ones). All people is able to think what they want, but for me, science is not God. The only God for me is God. And since we live among human beings and not little angels, science could be manipulate, faked, etc. We may believe that a proof was made (for papers tell us that it's like this) and that was not true, etc.

  History is a hard profession, and historian must always grin when a new about a history subject breaks out in great titles in the papers. Historians must KEEP researching in his/her own until he/she is satisfied about what he/she finds...And perhaps, that they "found" as the truth wasn't the truth at all and further researchs show you that you were absolutely wrong. The first Historian quality must be DOUBT. Without it, you can't be a researcher, and you will only a be a "paper and TV-News believer".

 I remember when I read (yes, in a newspaper  ) that it was "The End of Anastasia's mistery", for her corpse was in the common gravesite. Sometime later, I purchased a book about the issue...and I knew that there was a lot of controverse about who was there, and that scientist believed that Maria or Anastasia were missing from the gravesite. But of course, papers didn't said a single word about their mistake. It was not "The End of Anastasia's Mistery" at all.

  When I was more younger (16-20 years old), I didn't believe in AA, nor in any claimants. For me it was ridicoulous to think that someone could have survived to the massacre. But I haven't read much yet, and when I started to read, to see photos, to compare facts etc I was already convinced that someone survived. When the DNA results come out my first thought was: "These are fake". I'm a fool, a conspirative person, a crazy woman myself, an idiot who questiones science (Oh..That's not right. In fact I question only "scientist" and not science) , I'm this and that. I know. But I' convinced, and I'm not a fairy-tale believer...quite the opposite.

  Sorry. We'll speak the next 10 years or so (perhaps more, perhaps less), and we'll see how is "the Romanov's case" in the future. I know you'll answer me with the DNA issue. I'm very sure about what I think and why. Sorry again.

RealAnastasia.

1849

The Myth and Legends of Survivors / Re: Claimants of Tsarevich Alexei Nikolaevich

« on: June 10, 2005, 07:38:12 PM »

I don't understand why they ust paid for something like this...The "Alexei case" is important for History, at least to be able to said that Tammet was not Alexei. And if the family is poor...must they give up to they right to know WHO they are? (Even if Tammet was not Alexei) I've a cousin who was not sure to be her father's daughter and wanted to do a DNA proof...but since she isn't awfully rich, she couldn't do it. And she still not know who was her father. Sad enough...All in this life is money.  

RealAnastasia.

1850

The Myth and Legends of Survivors / Re: AA and "this night" in the cellar.

« on: June 10, 2005, 07:31:46 PM »

Just your opinion...And my point of view is also this: just my opinion.

  Bear post a great message about all this poor woman suffering, in a psychologic point of view and I appreciate it, since I'm not very bright in psychologie issues.   Your threads are always interesting , Bear, and we always learn something new reading them.

  And yes: AA was a crazy woman. That's for sure. Whoever she was her mind was ill. Nobody would deny it. But I don't think she had all she wanted. She didn't want notoriety, nor publicity: she was very agressive with journalist, and sometimes mean tovisitors, and even to her own supporters. No; she didn't have a nice life, and I wouldn't have liked to change my life to her own. Not at all. She lived without work...And so what? Her life was a nightmare; nobody loved her, and I suppose, she didn't love anyone . That's sad. Too sad.

 I repeat it: I don't know who this lady was, and if I would have been a Tzar daughter, I would like to have died in this cellar, along, with all my family. I believe AN survived, but I don't wish it. I said that I'm a romantic, and certainly it's more romantic to have a whole family dying together, rather than imagine that someone really escaped and lived a nightmare, awful life. I tryed to convince myself that all of them died, but I can't. I always have too many questions coming to my mind to think the case is closed. I know already I'm a stupid, a candide, a believer in Easter-Bunnies and all. But I just can't help it. Don't blame me.

RealAnastasia.

1851

Imperial Claimants Post Here / Re: GD Xenia / Anna Anderson Comparison

« on: June 10, 2005, 06:53:39 PM »

Hi, Lass! You are right..I MUST learn to post photos here. This is not easy for me for the moment, as long as I don't have a photobucket account. I may email you privately and send you the photos to you to post. Anyway I don't know if I may post them here, for they come from Peter Kurth site, and they must be copyrighted. Sadly, I couldn't get AA photos from other places than Peter Kurth site, for there aren't any... It's hard to have good AA photos, beside the few ones we all know. There are all in the net. The photos from the Blair Lovell books are not clear, and not good at all.

  I may post here the link to Peter Kurth site, and you will see good AA photos posted there. The author always has his site updated and with new photos in it. The photos are amazing, and you'll notice what I was saying: the first photos of AA are very different than later ones! Really!  

Here is the link:

www.peterkurth.com

Good luck!

RealAnastasia

1852

Imperial Claimants Post Here / Re: Two Vancouver Tsesarevichs?

« on: June 10, 2005, 06:33:16 PM »

I suppose that Alekseevich could go to the Orthodox Church where he was christianed to see his father's name. But I imagine that he must be under a fake name... :-/ If he really was Alexei he wouldn't go and said everywhere : "I'm Alexei Nicolaievich Romanov". Most of serious claimants had fear to said who they really were...if they were who they claimed to be. What a trouble to said it! I couldn't even understan what I'm trying to said, LOL!  

RealAnastasia.

1853

The Myth and Legends of Survivors / Re: AA and "this night" in the cellar.

« on: June 09, 2005, 09:05:01 PM »

You said it better than I, Bear: AA "...had the guilt of being a survivor and all the guilt of being one who lived while the others perished..." I think she was guilty especially concerning her mother's fate. Whoever her mother was, I suppose that's true.

RealAnastasia.

1854

The Myth and Legends of Survivors / Re: AA and "this night" in the cellar.

« on: June 09, 2005, 09:00:19 PM »

Hi again, Delle:

                            Actually I steel believe in AA, and I suppose her trauma most have cause her to not tell what she suffered in this cellar (If she was Anastasia, of course), or to tell is in a very weird way.

                             I don't recall exactly in which TV show about AA I hear it, but I remember her, saying, almost in tears something over the lines of: "...It was awful...I can't tell you what happened...It's so dirty...so awful...please, no..." She clearly couldn't bear all her sufferings back then.  Maybe it was "the cellar trauma", perhaps, she was FS and she was recalling the accident where a work friend died. She had a trauma, anyway.

                               When I read AA statement in Blair Lovell book (I mean when she said "there was no massacre") the first thought I have was clearly: " There was a massacre in Ekaterinbourg; her own mind was denying it, for she didn't want this to happen..." Of course, you must remember very well AA words speaking about her escape: "I leave my mother behind...I left my mother alone...". Did you remember which family member she called out when she had her last attack in Germany: "Mama! Mama! Where is my mother?" And did you remember which member of her family she named when Tatiana Botkina give her a Photo Album about IF: "My Mother! My Mother!".

              She had a trauma...And whoever she was, she suffered a lot in her life.

RealAnastasia.

1855

Olga Nicholaievna / Re: How Often Did Olga Get Sick?

« on: June 09, 2005, 08:33:59 PM »

Anemia is not loss of blood, but having a poor blood. I don't know exactly how explain it well in English. My English is very poor too...

RealAnastasia.

1856

The Final Chapter / Re: Nich II's Different Death Reports

« on: June 09, 2005, 08:05:44 PM »

I'm wondering if all these "Perm Stories" were not made up for Bolsheviks themselves to deturn people's attention, or to make people think Nicholas and her family were alive and kicking. There were a lot of Perm's witnesses, but I don't know if they were authentic or not...

RealAnastasia.

1857

Imperial Claimants Post Here / Re: GD Xenia / Anna Anderson Comparison

« on: June 09, 2005, 07:55:34 PM »

Thank you for sharing this with us, Lass. The ressemblance is amazing! Really!   You know me as an AA supporter, but even as one I have loooots of questions without answer about her. For example: why she DOESN'T ressemble HERSELF some years later? I'm a perfect idiot posting photos (I must learn to do it!   I must!  ), but if you compare AA first spanshots with later ones, you'll notice that she had slimest features, specially in her nose and mouth...And her eyes were DIFFERENT too!!! LOL   Opinions?

RealAnastasia.

1858

Imperial Claimants Post Here / Re: AA Looks Like...?

« on: June 09, 2005, 07:46:45 PM »

My God! This woman seems to be an "all people look-alike".   She is similar to a lot of women.   That's make me laugh.

RealAnastasia.

1859

Imperial Claimants Post Here / Re: The Heino Tammet case

« on: June 09, 2005, 07:44:58 PM »

Well, Lizameridox, I'm not a Heino Tammet supporter, but I don't know for sure WHO he was. Maybe (most likely) he was not Alexei; maybe he was him. We don't know. We don't know even the DNA results.

Years would tell us who this gentleman was.

RealAnastasia.

1860

The Myth and Legends of Survivors / Re: AA and the books about the IF.(1920-1923)

« on: June 09, 2005, 07:26:05 PM »

Thank you for you info, Bear! Actually, I posted the book list to show that AA must not have been FS, since she couldn't read French, nor English,and much less Russian (I didn't think she would be able to read cyrillic characters). And I suppose it's not accurate to said that most of these books "must have been published" in the early 20's, for we don't know for sure if they were. If someone here could understand German, maybe he or she could show a new list with German books (translated or not) about the IF. Perhaps the whole list was translated into German, but perhaps it was not like this. Well. My answer today is "I don't know".  

        Thank you for your quotations of Peter Kurth's and Blair Lovell's books, Bear...Even if the last one is not always accurate.

RealAnastasia.