1360
« on: October 12, 2004, 09:57:29 AM »
It seems to me that there is actually a blended concept to this idea of whose property belongs to whom. Robert and Marquis make excellent points especially, as Robert points out, that we are in a different era now and there is little chance of turning back some aspects of time...and property. The subjects of the aristocracies did in fact create the wealth of the monarchs, much to the subjects misery. But, the subjects, while acheiving little monetary wealth, had a HUGE benefit from the monachies in the social and religious systems that were set in place. Western civilization and the structure and nature of art, science, philosophy, architecture, sociology, etc, are due in large part to the aristocracies giving such things back to their subjects. So, it was a give and take, take and give. When the aristocracies got "fired", so went the corner office, the limo, and the other perks and bonuses. I think the bigger issue is not so much who among the current generation of generally unaccomplished aristocratic lineage have their forebearers' treasures or which museums/states have been recipients of such; rather, where are the treasures that were, in fact, stolen by private looters and military-sponsored looting? Ultimately, everything of value will be available for public viewing/enjoyment. We just need to find it all.