446
« on: February 26, 2005, 04:23:16 PM »
It has often been said that "behind a Romanov man there was a Romanov woman"... that is to say, behind every male in the family, there was a woman manipulating him. I think this is extendable to Nicholas II certainly, for he was well and truly under Alexandra's thumb, and to his brother Michael, but especially to the Vladimirovichi (I believe "Aunt Miechen" too frivolous). Andrew and Boris I consider a pair of wasters. Kyrill also fell to Ducky's grip, and if he had had any sense of duty he would have dropped his feelings for her (she was, at any rate, married to her cousin Ernst Ludwig at the time, and her marriage to Kyrill only brought mayhem to the family). Ducky was also one of the worst women in the family. In general however it is hard to say which Romanovs were in any way popular. I'm a true monarchist but I see Nicholas II and most of his predecessors as tyrants, and whatever they did good, they did badly ten times more often. The children I cannot comment on, they had no time to prove themselves as human beings really. In general I think they all liked to indulge in whatever they found amusing, and quite frankly, it's not surprising there's no monarchy in Russia today. However, I'd agree any of the Vladimirovichi is the most disagreeable of all Romanovs, but I don't like Sergei Alexandrovich nor Uncle Bimbo any the more likeable.
NOTE: This is my first message, did I do too badly?