83
« on: May 05, 2008, 12:51:28 PM »
You've obviously not read a word I've written. But I'm not one to give up easily, especially with regards to my greatest passion. Mind you, I only have a small collection of 150 scores and that's not much to brag about, considering most people I know have at least 500 or so. Still, you know absolutely nothing about the nature of filmmaking, it's clear from your words. I've changed my recommendations for composers many times in the past few posts, but the general consensus is that you would need a score from the likes of Horner, Williams, James Newton Howard, Thomas Newman, John Debney, Hans Zimmer (as loathe as I am to recommend him), Harry Gregson-Williams, or Gabriel Yared (primarily). But I think I can amend my recommendation a bit for this one composer who has slipped my mind entirely, and was brought to my attention by some fellow score collectors:
Angelo Badalamenti. This interesting NY native has brought to life the tragedy of WWI in the film A Very Long Engagement (a film from your country, am I correct, lulururu?) Now, I myself am not too acquainted with his works, but I do remember seeing Dark Water and recall how interesting the score was. It was pretty subtle, tonal, that's not what I would have expected for a horror movie. But it fit well with the tone the story set. I also remember The Beach, and how impressive that film was strictly based on his music. I am researching him as we speak, and I must thank you and the friends for the recommendation, he's incredible! Who would have ever thought such simple compositions, such tones, would be so emotional? I honestly wouldn't have given him a second look until we had this debate.
I cannot find any actual scenes of his works, but I find plenty of his music on youtube set to pictures. Still, not the way that the music was quite meant to be used, so I won't share them with you. I only recommend The Beach, A Very Long Engagement, Farenheit, City of Lost Children, Dark Water, and Twin Peaks. Some recommended Mulholland Drive, but the instruments wouldn't really suit a score for a film about the Imperial Family (he uses electric guitar in it).
Okay, it's official, he would be the best man to go to for this. Absolutely phenomenal composer, I can't believe I've not had the pleasure of getting any of his works on album. (Then again, I've only been collecting for 12 years...) When I'm done writing this I'm off to Amazon to add some things to my wish list.
Another composer I think worth checking out is Mark Isham. He has similar tonal influences in his work for Crash, which was really lousy on album, but it worked extremely well in the film (much to my dismay LOL!). Now, his work for Miracle and Eight Below wouldn't be what I would suggest, he would have to push himself and really use something more extravagant to suit the characters of the Imperial Family.. In Miracle, the size of his orchestras varied, as did the tone of his compositions, to reflect the many small miracles that happened before "the big one," so to speak. In the middle, for example, he used a Tchaikovsky-ensemble, as he termed it, with minimal musicians, but still more than he used in the beginning. He wanted to show that things were looking promising, but he wanted to wait before he got the music really grand. In the final cue, The Miracle, he says he used a Mahler-ensemble, which the largest orchestra of the 3 he used in this film. He wanted to showcase the intensity of the game, the direty of the situation when Jim Craig wouldn't get up, for example, the anticipation, the feelings the players must have felt. He also didn't want the orchestra to go into a big crescendo every time the US team scored. There were small moments of joy during that cue, but nothing was intensified until the last goal was scored by Eruzione. For the remainder of the cue, he stuck to strictly percussion, showing how things were not over yet, even though the audience knew the final result, the music still kept them in suspense, and then once the game was officially over, the largest crescendo occured, signifying that the miracle was accomplished. Of course the score and film didn't end there, they had to summarize what happened in the game against Finland, so he continued a minimalistic tone until the end of the film a minute or so later, to serve as background for Kurt Russel's narration. Such attention to detail would suit the film well. Of course, if you took the time, most composers are passionate about the details they need in order to accomplish a desired effect. Even the right orchestra can make all the difference. Adult choirs and children's choirs have different effects on a score as well, as anyone who's heard a Danny Elfman score and paid attention could tell you.
I think we've firmly established my expertise in this area here. You can't disrespect film scores just because of a lousy 2-3 seconds of classical music you heard in a documentary. Just because of that, those lousy 3 seconds, you automatically assume that any film score would be a waste of time. I think I've successfully proved you wrong. But I am always ready to continue this and provide still more evidence (whereas you have yet to produce any others) to the contrary. I've cited Schindler's List, the greatest score John Williams has ever written, in his opinion, Apollo 13, 1408, Troy, Star Wars: Episode IV, The Village, Psycho, The Passion of the Christ, Nosferatu, Crash, and Miracle. I know there are many others, but I am distracted by Badalamenti's scores right now so I will get back to this after I go to amazon.
I've noticed in many documentaries that films of WWI have sound added to them, and it's meant to sound accurate, but there was no sound at that time. Do you honestly expect to find WWI weapons and fire them in the sound editing booth, and add them in the film? Right, I can just see a WWI plane in the sound editing booth being revved up and its weapons shot. Guns would be realistic, though. However, you couldn't shoot them into actual bodies, now could you? You need the sound of a bullet piercing the flesh, as well as ricocheting off of the jeweled clothing beneath, and you need to be educated enough so that you can understand that you can NOT shoot your cast in an authentic way, or you'll be tried for murder. Just how do you expect to get those sounds to seem authentic without killing your cast? Not to mention you would need fake blood and so on. Glad to see you understand at least one thing about filmmaking, you need to rebuild some things, but again, you couldn't film them exactly on location. I'm sure the landscape has changed much over the past 9 decades. I think there's a chapel where the Ipatiev House stood, you surely don't intend to film it there, right? Of course not. But it could be done on a sound stage. You remember (I hope) how passionate James Cameron was about authenticity and accuracy in Titanic, having even the china and carpets made by the same company that worked on the original. It did cost over 200million and Cameron's own salary to make it, yet look at it now. The studio believed in Cameron because he knew what he was doing, so I wouldn't lose hope just yet, but you really don't know what you're doing as of yet. As time goes by you'll become educated and understand how films are made.