Author Topic: Re: Princess Diana - Part 2  (Read 198602 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

timfromengland

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #300 on: April 10, 2010, 10:04:39 AM »
wonderful Violetta....  lovely pics  thanks

Offline violetta

  • Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • View Profile
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #301 on: April 10, 2010, 10:32:11 AM »
and some more, heavensent







Lindelle

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #302 on: April 11, 2010, 04:33:43 AM »
Lindelle I am afraid I do not have a link to any photographs of the purported vision of Diana's face that was apparently visible to some of those who queued to sign the Book of condolence! I must admit I had quite forgotten about it until I found it in the Crash contagion article.

As to the airing of dirty laundry that Charles and Diana both chose to indulge in, I think they were as guilty as one another! Ultimately children tend to be the silent, bewildered and often frightened victims in marriage break-ups! I am sure many will remember Diana's emotive little vignette which she shared with Morton about the time William pushed loo paper under the door when she was having one her cries! Heaven only knows how old he would have been at the time! I also wonder how I would feel if I had found out my mother had apparently thrown herself down a flight of stairs when pregnant with me!  


Thanks Margot for trying to find the pic.
And I agree with your last paragraph. I don't think people seem to get what I'm saying.
Just the thought of parents telling the world about their marriage would be something I as a child wouldn't get over. As an adult, different story, but a CHILD?

Lindelle

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #303 on: April 11, 2010, 04:36:53 AM »
Did nt  Diana her true story ... predate the TV interview ?
and must have been far more devastating when it  came out.....  did it come
out in the  annus horribilis ... 1992  ?

I have a feeling that Diana came to regret giving those  interviews  to her  " friend "
that were then passed onto  Andrew Morton.
It might have been cathartic for her at the  time.... but how could she give so much
private and personal information to that creep Morton   earning millions for him
and his publishers when  Diana was nt going to get a red cent out of it.

  It shows how  foolish and naive she was at that time...  and probably vindictive  too !


Very well said

Offline violetta

  • Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • View Profile
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #304 on: April 11, 2010, 06:47:11 AM »





Condecontessa

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #305 on: April 11, 2010, 09:56:48 AM »
On reply# 577, the first pic that you posted violetta, the princess looks like she's taking a little nap. How sweet. Thanks for posting the pics.

Robert_Hall

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #306 on: April 11, 2010, 10:14:53 AM »
I do not think she was taking a nap.  She & Charles had just a big argument and she was not speaking to him.

Offline violetta

  • Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • View Profile
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #307 on: April 11, 2010, 11:08:27 AM »
On reply# 577, the first pic that you posted violetta, the princess looks like she's taking a little nap. How sweet. Thanks for posting the pics.


i`m sure this picture was taken in germany,during the waleses` visit there.it was 86 or 87 i.e. when their relations started to deteriorate. if you lok at their body language it`s clear that they are drifting apart...

Lindelle

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #308 on: April 12, 2010, 12:31:02 AM »
I like pic *571, the first one.
It shows Diana and Anne having fun - for a change.

timfromengland

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #309 on: April 12, 2010, 02:59:18 AM »
 i watched a 50 min vid last night about Diana and her jewellry
very interesting.... the cambridge emeralds  etc...
interesting that she was fond of  pearl chokers ...  ( reminiscent of  Princess Alexandra )
Ill have to put the vid on rapidshare and send in a link ! )

Lindelle

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #310 on: April 12, 2010, 04:10:42 AM »
I think I've seen that Heavenscent.
Was part of 'The Private Eye', and was called Diana's Life In Jewels'?, cause if it was it was quite good.
Did you see the pic where Diana is wearing a choker that she received as a gift from an Arabian Prince and after her death Camilla is seen wearing it. I'm sure it was a brooch.

By the way "The Private Eye"? or something like it.

Offline Grace

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 3126
    • View Profile
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #311 on: April 12, 2010, 05:23:04 AM »
It's on youtube.  Was going to have a look until I read the third line of Lindelle's last post.  I think I'd choke...

Lindelle

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #312 on: April 12, 2010, 11:09:04 PM »
No, really you should watch it.
If i'm mistaken with it being called 'Private Eye', then of course, "Diana, her life in jewels", will get you there.
Yes Grace I was disgusted when the photo of Camilla wearing the EXACT brooch was shown.
The gall of that woman.
It's one thing to say a piece of jewellery is ok to be worn as it's part of the crown, but this was Diana's personal jewel. And there's Camilla sitting there in all her glory WEARING it.
I would've thought PC would have had more feeling for his boy's than to let her wear it.
Absolutely abhorent.

But a fascinating amount of jewels.

Robert_Hall

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #313 on: April 13, 2010, 01:34:10 AM »
We do not know the circumstances behind that, though.  AS I understand,  Diana's jewels were given to her sons, so perhaps they gave it to Camilla to wear.

Margot

  • Guest
Re: Princess Diana - Part 2
« Reply #314 on: April 13, 2010, 02:13:10 AM »
Who really cares for that matter? The point is, that the brooch appears to have been worn by both Diana and Camilla! If it is the same piece....so what? It appears to be family piece! If William and Harry weren't up in arms about it, than why should we minions be?

Does it really matter? For goodness sake it is only a piece of poxy jewelry after all! Surely we are all 'mature' and emotionally responsible enough to accept that if William and Harry have no issue than neither should nor really by right, do any of us for that matter! IMHo there are far more pressing things that all immediate members of the family including Diana, had she lived, would have worried about than who was wearing Queen Alexandra's brooch!!!!

I defy any Diana worshippers to turn round and post back a 'But the boys were probably forced by duty to accept the situation....' type 'nonsense' rubbish! We all know that such a situation is not the case!
« Last Edit: April 13, 2010, 02:23:17 AM by Margot »