Author Topic: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II  (Read 202291 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eddie_uk

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 2925
    • View Profile
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #60 on: October 31, 2007, 12:40:20 PM »


Warn you,publicly,back off,and do not ever dare to send any hatefull pm's to any forum members that doesn't agree with you again.Ever.


Thank you ahdean and Lucien, glad to know I am not the only one to receieve hateful emails from Dmitri. Shame he doesn't have anything better to do, actually made me laugh!!
Grief is the price we pay for love.

FREE PALESTINE.

Robert_Hall

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #61 on: October 31, 2007, 02:12:24 PM »
It seems I must drop in to remind posters about the rules of the Forum.  Personal attacks on the living are forbidden, including HH Charles and Duchess Camilla.  A good rule of thumb is "would you say that to their face in person"? If not, then don't say it here.

Opinions are fine, personal attacks aren't. When in doubt, leave it out.

Then why is Sarah exempt from this exclusion on personal attacks?

Arleen_Ristau

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #62 on: October 31, 2007, 02:56:39 PM »
I certainly don't mean this to be disrespectful....but does anyone know why Charles hands always look so swollen and red in all his photos?   That is one of the signs of heart disease.  I hope that they will have many good years together.....it took them so long to achieve it.

Just ignore dimitry he is always the same in every section he posts in.....he must be a terribly unhappy fellow.  Eddie has the right attitude....laugh a lot.     In the end Bob calls the shots.....thank goodness for Bob!!

Arleen

casey

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #63 on: October 31, 2007, 04:12:00 PM »
I think H.R.H. The Duchess of Cornwall looked stunning.  I am quite pleased that she is sporting the family order.  I long for the day, when she received GCVO, and KG.


Leuchtenberg

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #64 on: October 31, 2007, 04:46:45 PM »
I am quite pleased that she is sporting the family order.  I long for the day, when she received GCVO, and KG.



I am not.  And I hope I am dead before she receives the GCVO or the KG.

Offline ChristineM

  • Moderator
  • Velikye Knyaz
  • *****
  • Posts: 2882
    • View Profile
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #65 on: October 31, 2007, 05:29:09 PM »
This is the problem.   It is impossible to make anyone like or respect the Duchess of Cornwall.

In the beginning I viewed her from a very negative standpoint.   To date I think she has performed her role quite immaculately.   She seems to me to be a warm woman, but truthfully, I will never really know.   Just as none of us know the true characters which lie behind the people we know as the Windsor Family.

What is much more serious is the perception of my fellow countrymen.   I live in the UK where there has been very a slight improvement in the publics' perception of the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall, but far from sufficient to permit them to begin to build a successful monarchy.   The history and the damage done over the last couple of decades, could rob us of a royal house which, in its various forms, has survived many centuries.   For Britain, for the Commonwealth and for the world at large, this would be a serious loss.   In the UK, the mass of the general public, and young people in particular, are not remotely interested in either Charles or Camilla.

Unfortunately, Princes William and Harry and their respective girlfriends are regarded in much the same way as many of the 'celebrities' who, in reality, are total nonenties.   Their faces and their lifestyles stare out at us from the same tabloids and rag mags.   School children are no longer taught the relevance of royalty in this country - much in the same way that they do not know that milk comes from cows - in fact most city kids have never even seen a cow - and certainly have never seen a lump of coal.

In this technological, multicultural,, secular society, there's not much room for what could be perceived as the anachronism of royalty.   This is why the disasters which have befallen the House of Windsor for almost thirty years, could yet have irreversible repercussions.   God forbid, but this is the world of UK 2007 as I see it.

tsaria

 
« Last Edit: November 01, 2007, 05:26:10 AM by tsaria »

Leuchtenberg

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #66 on: October 31, 2007, 05:46:28 PM »
This is the problem.   It is impossible to make anyone like or respect the Duchess of Cornwall.

In the beginning I viewed her from a very negative standpoint.   To date I think she has performed her role quite immaculately.   She seems to me to be a warm woman, but truthfully, I will never really know.   Just as none of us know the true characters which lie behind the people we know as the Windsor Family.

What is much more serious is the perception of my fellow countrymen.   I live in the UK where there has been very a slight improvement in the public's perception of the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall, but far from sufficient to permit them to begin to build a successful monarchy.   The history and the damage done over the last couple of decades, could rob us of a royal house which, in its various forms, has survived many centuries.   For Britain, for the Commonwealth and for the world at large, this would be a serious loss.   In the UK, the mass of the general public, and young people in particular, are not remotely interested in either Charles or Camilla.

Unfortunately, Princes William and Harry and their respective girlfriends are regarded in much the same way as many of the 'celebrities' who, in reality, are total nonenties.   Their faces and their lifestyles stare out at us from the same tabloids and rag mags.   School children are no longer taught the relevance of royalty in this country - much in the same way that they do not know that milk comes from cows - in fact most city kids have never even seen a cow - and certainly have never seen a lump of coal.

In this technological, multicultural,, secular society, there's not much room for what could be perceived as the anachronism of royalty.   This is why the disasters which have befallen the House of Windsor for almost thirty years, could yet have its irreversible repercussions.   God forbid, but this is the world of UK 2007 as I see it.

tsaria

 

Very well written/spoken tsaria!   

alixaannencova

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #67 on: October 31, 2007, 06:11:51 PM »
Tsaria I could not have even tried to put it better!!!

Still I do think that all said and done, the Duchess' membership within the family since marriage has so far not done any long lasting damage! I may even go far as to say that IMO she is looking more the part of consort as the months pass by!

Alexander1917

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #68 on: October 31, 2007, 06:32:48 PM »
Is the family oder new made, or the Queen Mum hers? anybody knows?

Offline TampaBay

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4213
  • Being TampaBay is a Full Time Job.
    • View Profile
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #69 on: October 31, 2007, 08:08:05 PM »
It seems I must drop in to remind posters about the rules of the Forum.  Personal attacks on the living are forbidden, including HH Charles and Duchess Camilla.  A good rule of thumb is "would you say that to their face in person"? If not, then don't say it here.

Opinions are fine, personal attacks aren't. When in doubt, leave it out.



 Then why is Sarah exempt from this exclusion on personal attacks?

Robert,

I love Sarah York and would love to take her to lunch (with me picking up the tab) and tell her exactly how  I think she has and is going wrong. LOL! LOL!

TampaBay
"Fashion is so rarely great art that if we cannot appreciate great trash, we should stop going to the mall.

Offline grandduchessella

  • Global Moderator
  • Velikye Knyaz
  • *****
  • Posts: 13039
  • Getting Ready to Move to Europe :D
    • View Profile
    • Facebook page
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #70 on: October 31, 2007, 08:42:17 PM »
Here's the photo from the Daily Mail:

They also serve who only stand and wait--John Milton
Come visit on Pinterest--http://pinterest.com/lawrbk/

Eric_Lowe

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #71 on: October 31, 2007, 09:04:36 PM »
I really must say that large tiaras do not suit Camilla's big hair styles... :(

dmitri

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #72 on: October 31, 2007, 11:04:43 PM »
Extremely well said Tsaria. Sadly the couple in question could very well be the reason why a number of The current Queen's Realms choose to become republics after the death of Elizabeth II. All the media spin will not change the perception of a couple many feel are unworthy. Basic respect does not exist for this couple in very large numbers. The lack of education in our schools is also a reason to fear for the long term survival of the monarchy. Elizabeth II and the long term survival of the monarchy should not be confused.

Mari

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #73 on: November 01, 2007, 01:53:00 AM »

Quote
I am not.  And I hope I am dead before she receives the GCVO or the KG.
Quote

I don't see that earthiness and salty language improve the Royal Family's image...I'm sorry I just don't see it!

Quote
In this technological, multicultural,, secular society, there's not much room for what could be perceived as the anachronism of royalty
Quote

Yes, and that is the basic problem there is almost no room for mistakes..its all down to respect in the end! Isn't it?
« Last Edit: November 01, 2007, 02:01:28 AM by Mari »

Arleen_Ristau

  • Guest
Re: Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall, Part II
« Reply #74 on: November 01, 2007, 03:16:05 PM »
Here I am again, stupid to the end......but what is a GCVO and a KG??

Arleen