alexi naked

[Imperial_Grounds]

He was a 13 year old boy gunned down for who his Father and Mother were and nothing else.

And let's not forget that Alexei was Heir to the throne, Nicholas might have abdicated but we all know the Communists saw them as the symbol of the former world, and therefore wanted to destroy that symbol. And since Alexei was Heir they probably were scared Royalists might have proclaimed him Tsar if he remained alive(Like they did in France with the little Louis XVII of France after the revolution)

[scelli@swbell.net]

I'm speechless about what you've written...and you certainly can't say that about me very often. What a sad, sorry state of affairs.

[Michael HR]

True of course

He was a 13 year old boy gunned down for who his Father and Mother were and nothing else.

And let's not forget that Alexei was Heir to the throne, Nicholas might have abdicated but we all know the Communists saw them as the symbol of the former world, and therefore wanted to destroy that symbol. And since Alexei was Heir they probably were scared Royalists might have proclaimed him Tsar if he remained alive(Like they did in France with the little Louis XVII of France after the revolution)

[Michael HR]

1984 here we come.

A man was arrested in the last few days for taking a photo of a Police car parked in a bus stop under the terrorist laws! England is not the home of civil liberties anymore I am sorry to say.

I'm speechless about what you've written...and you certainly can't say that about me very often. What a sad, sorry state of affairs.

[lulururu]

In France, we don't have this problem yet... But we mustn't underestimate Sarkozy, he loves the United States and England so maybe we'll see that kind of problems arrive in France
But I think that we mustn't link our modern (and ridiculous) problems to these pictures because they didn't think about that at all and because these pictures represent cute scenes...

[Robert_Hall]

Every country has it's pluses and minuses.  No place is perfect. I live in one of the most expensive cities in the US- San FRancisco. Even with the housing slump,  we are not terribly affected by that here.  The suburbs are suffering  though. Gas is not much of a problem either, as most of us use the public transportation we have.  Driving in the City is a real hassle. My second home is London, one of the most costly cities in the world, and I am fully aware of the problems there as well.  I am a true Anglophile so I love  being able to spend so much time in England.  And over 30 years, I have seen the many changes. But I get by nicely in both places. I do not drive, but the gas price here, in the City, is  around $4.67 a gallon.

[Tsarfan]

Yeah, I thought it was a little strange everyone was talking about his privates in that particular picture. Nudity does have that effect on people, which is understanding since it's considered "bad," but it's like no one noticed anything else.

I don't know that anyone is considering this particular piece of nudity "bad".  One of the chief roles of a monarchical pair was to produce offspring that could keep the dynasty going, and to that end royal genitalia have long been matters of much speculation, some discussion, and occasional examination.

Prior to marriage, prospective queens were often physically examined for suitability to bear children.  Regnant queens were often forced to bear children with senior members of the court present in order to bear witness that the child was not exchanged at birth.  Queen Elizabeth was reportedly examined prior to France's entertaining the possibility of a marriage with the Duc d'Anjou.  Louis XVI's inability to have an erection because of a tight foreskin was a matter of wide report in diplomatic circles and the subject of a frank discussion between him and Joseph II of Austria.  The 12-year delay of the future Catherine II after her marriage to Grand Duke Peter in becoming pregnant was the matter of much speculation about Peter's physical capabilities.

In pretender lore, much has been made of a claim by a Canadian to have been Alexis, with some of the evidence presented being an undescended testicle that was supposedly common to both Alexis and the claimant.  Moreover, this claimant's proponents have brandished the tale that the Canadian Royal Mounted Police who were sent to check out this supposed Alexis were given a show-and-tell of his testicles to drive the claim home.

So we've heard something of Alexis' genitalia before.  Now we have the opportunity to examine them photographically.  What's the big deal?  Why bother to post a picture of him naked otherwise?  We already knew that he went swimming.  We already knew that he had bruises from hemophilia attacks.  We already knew how tall he was.  We already knew that Derevenko was his constant companion in all activities.  The only new information in this photo is the appearance of his genitalia.

Lighten up, everybody.

[Binky]

Yeah.

[Michael HR]

Could not agree more

[Binky]

Oops, sorry. 

[tom_romanov]

Yeah, I thought it was a little strange everyone was talking about his privates in that particular picture. Nudity does have that effect on people, which is understanding since it's considered "bad," but it's like no one noticed anything else.

I don't know that anyone is considering this particular piece of nudity "bad".  One of the chief roles of a monarchical pair was to produce offspring that could keep the dynasty going, and to that end royal genitalia have long been matters of much speculation, some discussion, and occasional examination.
So we've heard something of Alexis' genitalia before.  Now we have the opportunity to examine them photographically.  What's the big deal?  Why bother to post of picture of him naked otherwise?  We already knew that he went swimming.  We already knew that he had bruises from hemophilia attacks.  We already knew how tall he was.  We already knew that Derevenko was his constant companion in all activities.  The only new information in this photo is the appearance of his genitalia.
Lighten up, everybody.

i started this thread. if you look back i the start of this thread i posted it to see if any one else had seen the photo, not the perv over a child murdered 90 years ago.
how the topic has turned towards him not being able to have children or an undescened testicle is beyond me.
tom_romanov

[Michael HR]

If there is one thing I am learning here is that a conversation will change direction so quickly it is difficult to keep up sometimes. Most of the time it is fun to watch and read.

[tom_romanov]

If there is one thing I am learning here is that a conversation will change direction so quickly it is difficult to keep up sometimes. Most of the time it is fun to watch and read.

 i agree

[lulururu]

Is it really strange that a thread which is supposed to show alexei naked is used by some persons to talk about his crypto and his ability to have children ? I don't think so, in my concern the link is really easy to make... In addition, the forum isn't full of that kind of subjects and I don't think that someone's written something which is really shocking or insane   

[Holly]

I don't see this picture as 'bad' or any others of this nature. He's only a child.
Whether you agree or not, it is not alright to look at his reproductive organs and make comments (jokes) on the size of it. He was only a little boy. It will raise many eyebrows on your behalf...