I know this is terribly off topic but because we have been talking about publication, I got out that old rejection letter and, believe me, it hurt just as much to read it today as it did the first time.
Here is a small quote:
With all apologies I am returning ............... It was read by one of our resident historical romance experts, who found the idea for the novel, "quite good" and aspects of the story "touching", but she also, unfortunately, feels that the pacing is much too slow and that overall the story is too tame to sell in the Historical Romance market.
I'm sorry your manuscript languished in my office as long as it did; it and I seemed to have gotten buried for a while.
Thank you for sending this to us, and I hope you'll keep trying. You show real potential.
In another letter this was said:
( ) Production Manager, discussed the manuscript with Dell's Editor in Chief, ( ), who felt the manuscript was worthwhile and had given it two readings.
I would suggest the manuscript be submitted to Pocket Books (Simon & Schuster), New American Library, Ballantine Books and Bantam.
Some best sellers have made the rounds to several publishers before being accepted.
The problem was that no suggestions were given to improve the "pacing" or make the novel less "tame". We tried our best, but the second time we submitted it it never had another reading.
All of this happened between February 1983 and March 1984. As I said a very long time ago in a very different world.