oh god. Of course B&W pictures are free to use, no one is saying other thing., What it piss me off is found my pictures edited with oh coincidence! the same edition you give to your own creation.
No one is saying you cant colorize pictures, i ve seen your work and its awesome, but, can you explain why all those pictures were in YOUR galleries?. Why if you ask to another colorist over here to put their pictures in your videos WHY YOU DIDNT ASK ME to put my watermarked work in your webpage?. Come one! we re members of the same forum and we post colorized pictures in the same place. I knmow that "Faces from the past" is GD Ally, I know that Justine is Alix of Hesse (justine over here" i know that TZ its you. Why you posted those pictures and you didnt ask me (or just tell me) and you ask another to put those colored pictures in yout video?
That s one thing
another thing of the "something" of my watermark, dont put it between "" because ITS part of my watermark on it!
Your version (beautiful edition by the way)
"Some of my mark"
The one done by me (not the best i ve done...)
Where is placed the watermark
And again...You said this was my colorized picture in B&W with "some of my mark" removed?
Well...no!. This is the B&W version of my colorized one
(and if someone wants to do the try changing my version to B&W, here s the version. If you ppl have any doubt, try to become B&W Tatiana s version)
http://fc08.deviantart.com/fs37/f/2008/284/d/6/d648fb8826b7d13e541931b25e4cd08d.jpgPS: i wonder why you used the one with "some of my mark removed" instead the full version you posted. That one its much much better than the one i used!
Too much coincidence , dont you think?. I stand by my words and if i saw in any way CONCRETE proofs of what im saying its wrong, i ll be the first in ask you in open forum, apologies, cause i accept my mistakes. I dont need to hide behind a shield of lies.