Hi JM--
Intially when I read
Dancing In St. Petersberg I was impressed and liked Mathilde very much. I realized, of course, there was quite a bit she wasn't telling us . . . but then autiobiographies were a lot less forthcoming 30, 40 and 50 years ago!
However, after reading some of the information in this forum, my opinion of her has changed. I rather think she's telling us the truth--for the most part--about her relationship with Nicholas. But I also think she's being a bit more coy (or selective?) about certain things that would reflect ill on her.
It does appear that she was superb at looking out for herself--and good for her--but not always in an above-board way. Despite her travails, she does seem to have landed like a cat every time. (Maybe due to dancer's technique?!)

When consideing Mathilde it's also important to take into consideration the relationship of the Romanovs to ballet. The Grand Dukes were not only great patrons of the dance, but also found "happy hunting" among the scores of ballerinas in St. P. A bit like politicians going after Hollywood actresses, New York models, or national beauty queens! And any young woman entering this profession knew very well that while it would be physcially and artistically challenging, becoming a ballerina also held the promise of glamour plus possible patronage from certain members of the royal family

and other high-stratosphere "players."
Mathilde was undoubtedly a suprememly talented dancer, and I'm sure it would have been delightful to have attended her parties and to have moved in her social circles. But it seems--as with most people!--there was a whole lot more to her than met the eye . . . or that she would divulge!
