Author Topic: Do you dislike a French royal?  (Read 19915 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

erzsi

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #15 on: July 04, 2009, 11:00:58 AM »
@Kaiserin Alzbeta Sissi
Why do you think Louis had a weak character?
Do you was ever interest in his charakter or read some books about him and his charakter and not just only about Marie Antoinette?
With this statement, it seems that you also belive in the romor/lie of his phimosis, and that was the reason that he can´t produce a heir/child.
*rolleyes*

Silja

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #16 on: July 04, 2009, 02:42:23 PM »
[But his wife did a lot to damage his fame, specially during the revolution.
Marie Antoinette  destroyed his good name to conceal her own errors, eg. when she committed high treason against France and the king. With that eg. the Revolutionaries got the chance to judge infront of the tribunal.


And yet Louis XVI's view of the Revolution didn't much differ from Marie Antoinette's. Louis XVI wasn't a traitor, as Marie Antoinette technically was, but like MA he hoped for the military defeat of Revolutionary France, which is only natural and understandable in view of the king's ideology and given the situation the royal family were in. See Munro Price's The Road from Versailles. Louis XVI, Marie Antoientte and the Fall of the French Monarchy.

Marie Antoinette wasn't actually helping Louis a lot in terms of his reputation, but it was the pamphleteers, the court, and finally the Revolutionaries who destroyed Louis XVI's good name, also later by means of Marie Antoinette's trial. The Revolutionary Tribunal could never convict MA of treason, which they only suspected. Her show trial was however not so much about finding out whether MA was really guilty or not, but more about destroying Louis' character as a man and ruler. By denouncing MA in her trial as a treacherous foreigner, as a Messalina and bloodsucker who had dominated her husband and had influenced his political views, the tribunal actually hit at Louis and his regime and turned the queen into the witness for the prosecution against her already dead husband. A king who let himself and his country carelessly be ruled by a depraved foreign female, was not only a pathetic weakling but a criminal.  See Anette Taeger's fascinating final chapter from her Ludwig XVI.
In reality,  until very shortly before the Revolution, Marie Antoinette had actiually had practically no influence at all on French policies or her husband's political decisions, but this was of course irrelevant to a Revolution which had to justify itself to the world.

 

erzsi

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #17 on: July 04, 2009, 06:03:37 PM »
Yes of course he hope to get the help of them, cause the "Storm in Paris" was abnormal in his eyes and recontaminated the good mind of his "brave folk." And yes sure its totally understandable out of his position as a king. I never said the opposite. But that doesn´t mean the same, that he wanted to escape out of France.


Well, i wasn´t talking about the destroying of his good name during the Revolution. Cause in these time it was clear that the most of all the blame came from the Revolutionaries. Marat was the best example! I was also not talking about the show trail of MA. And yes sure they could convict MA for the treason and i also know and said why. Cause the documents came up years later. It was totally clear the the Revolutionaries showed Louis as a weak and stupid, fat man, which was dominated by his wife etc... Totally right. But do you always forget that there was a life of him before the Revolution starts? And during this time, MA did a lot and many things against him. Like his own siblings like Comte de Provence too eg. MA was influenced by Merci and Vermond, Artois and other very bad people. But she was blind for the right things... She blame her husband veeery often...
Little example :::from Bernard Fay = "The queen was really pregnant. The happiness of Louis XVI. seemed to be endless, every step od him betrayed him. After all these many indignities, vituperations and aspersions, wich he got through his wife, Louis XVI. won his good name back, everybody owed him; his long endurance was requited."
She also supported the rumor of his phimosis, Mercy bruited also to the empress. Cause of this she was afraid of MA position and sendt her son to France! Louis never had these phimosis, cause out of his dairy you can clearly see that he was on a hunting trip. And so on...
And well Angela Teager is one of the most bad books of him. Its a german one and i´m german... and sry...no way! She miss so many very important facts during his whole life to understand his character!!! And well its not really true that MA had actually had practically no influence at all on French policies or her husband's political decisions. Not before the Revolution, yeah...but she tried when Louis opened the Estates-General again and after Josephs death.

@Silja: when you understand french, you can read Jean Christian Petifils "Louis XVI"
« Last Edit: July 04, 2009, 06:16:01 PM by erzsi »

Ella1886

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #18 on: July 04, 2009, 09:36:45 PM »
I never thought much of Louis XVI either. He was always portrayed as weak and inefficient, but I read John Hardman's book 'Louis XVI: The Silent King' for a uni assignment and it provided a different view of him. To me it explained how he was landed with the reputation he now has, and through focusing on a different source base credited him with  being rather forward-thinking and very intelligient.  I now feel he was just the wrong person in the wrong place at the wrong time. I haven't read much on Louis XVI, but I would recommend this book. 

It also creates an enjoyable portrait of the rather unintelligent MA. ;D

Silja

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #19 on: July 05, 2009, 02:18:40 AM »
And well its not really true that MA had actually had practically no influence at all on French policies or her husband's political decisions. Not before the Revolution, yeah...but she tried when Louis opened the Estates-General again and after Josephs death.


What did I write? "up until very shortly before the Revolution" she had practically no influence.

I thought Bernard Fay's book on Louis XVI was one of the worst books I have ever read. It is not only totally unscholarly but also incredibly sexist.
Disagree about Annette Taeger although her account is indeed limited as regards many aspects.
Try also Hardman's Louis XVI.
« Last Edit: July 05, 2009, 02:21:00 AM by Silja »

Imperial_Grounds

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #20 on: July 05, 2009, 05:15:04 PM »
Well, she want that Leopold help her and her family but he only want to know what the french army arrange for the next attack against the austrian army.
He wasn´t interest in the person of his sister. And she doesn´t watched behind his plans. Cause she was sooo much into her wish to leave France, there was to much hate from her site for things the french folk did in her eyes which were actually her own fault. As said she never did anything good for the folk in the opposite to her husband. So its not really a right of her, to work in that way against France and there is also not deserving of understanding for her, i find!
And I think MA knows of the poorness of her folk but she wasn´t interested in it. For that she got enough examples!!!
Maria Theresia wrote very often in her letters, that she should be a Queen for her folk.

And the Biography from Fraser is not the best of Marie Antoinette, Fraser has her own view of MA... Like she imaged Kirsten Dunst in her acting like MA...and if you really know MA´s life you would/will know this movie /Dunst doesn´t represent MA in a right way!
A very good Biography is Vincent Cronin Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, it´s a very interesting Biography of the both, but be carful with it. Better is Bernard Fay and Jean Christian Petefils!! But sadly, i must gto say that the best books are just in french!

Well, I have seen Marie Antoinette(1938), Marie Antoinette(2006) and Marie Antoinette, La Veritable Histoire(2006) - docudrama, so correct retelling of her life. I will see if I can find the book you mentioned(I am about to take French classes so all little things help out), but we all have a different view - else it would be rather boring.

erzsi

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2009, 09:04:43 AM »
@Ella1886

Yes this book i have too and it was indeed nice. Its good that one of these books could changed your mind and view about him :)
And yapp thats true for MA. *g*

@Silja

I understood what you said...But you don´t got the point i actually meant.... AS I SAID...i wasn´t talking about her actions and behavior in the Revo. ONLY! There where enough happenings she did before too.



I thought Bernard Fay's book on Louis XVI was one of the worst books I have ever read. It is not only totally unscholarly but also incredibly sexist.
Disagree about Annette Taeger although her account is indeed limited as regards many aspects.
Try also Hardman's Louis XVI.

Ok and where it was sexist? Did i miss something? And where he is/was unscholarly? Fay was the totally FIRST who figured out the Louis never had an phimosis. He was the one who doesn´t showed Louis weak and stupid like before Zweig tried in his book/novel to MA!Fay explain the relationship between his oldest brother and gave a close view about his childhood... Also of his relationship to MA. Which wasn´t these "true" love, just at the beginning. (ok thats a different point now we didn´t talked about ^^°) Out of his book you get that it wasn´t also Joseph II earnings that they got their first child. Ok, Fay is a lil bit hard to read cause of all the politc-parts...yes... But sorry, your aspects sounds really far-fetched.

Writer like Evelyne Lever or Stefan Zweig and sadly also Antoinia Fraser where worse in the opposite...and with their rubbish view of Louis, which is in fact so sad, just cause to keep their illusion about MA.

And as said i have Hardmann. Maybe you should read as i also repeat myself again = Petifils. (just french)

@Imperial_Grounds

Well, she want that Leopold help her and her family but he only want to know what the french army arrange for the next attack against the austrian army.
He wasn´t interest in the person of his sister. And she doesn´t watched behind his plans. Cause she was sooo much into her wish to leave France, there was to much hate from her site for things the french folk did in her eyes which were actually her own fault. As said she never did anything good for the folk in the opposite to her husband. So its not really a right of her, to work in that way against France and there is also not deserving of understanding for her, i find!
And I think MA knows of the poorness of her folk but she wasn´t interested in it. For that she got enough examples!!!
Maria Theresia wrote very often in her letters, that she should be a Queen for her folk.

And the Biography from Fraser is not the best of Marie Antoinette, Fraser has her own view of MA... Like she imaged Kirsten Dunst in her acting like MA...and if you really know MA´s life you would/will know this movie /Dunst doesn´t represent MA in a right way!
A very good Biography is Vincent Cronin Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, it´s a very interesting Biography of the both, but be carful with it. Better is Bernard Fay and Jean Christian Petefils!! But sadly, i must gto say that the best books are just in french!

Well, I have seen Marie Antoinette(1938), Marie Antoinette(2006) and Marie Antoinette, La Veritable Histoire(2006) - docudrama, so correct retelling of her life. I will see if I can find the book you mentioned(I am about to take French classes so all little things help out), but we all have a different view - else it would be rather boring.


Umm...sry with that you got a really BAD start. MA1938 is a totally unrealistic movie about both. Even if i love Norma in it. But that was NOT MA! MA06 no comment either! More erorrs i saw in no other modern cinema-movie!
And well....sorry if i have to say that now but OMG...to Marie Antoinette, La Veritable Histoire(2006) I have these documentation. And...i was thinking so may times = Jeez whats going on! In there they said Joseph II came eg like he ws a emperor and NOT under his fake-name Graf von Falkenstein. That it was his goal that they got MT. In their they showed Louis still weak, a lil bit clumsy etc. Where was Mercy and Vermond (in all of them)?? ETC... MA was soo sweet and nice...o.0 And innocent all the time... LOL I´m really sorry. How you can say it was a correct retelling of her life? When it totally wasn´t! o.0 Well one of my best friends take french too, her Boyfriend is french. Her friends (studies)are french, she is almost every free times in France. And she agree with me too.
And sure its ok to have a different view, but you don´t have to miss the facts anyhow. Even if they are not fits in "your" (not you alone now ^.~) opinion. My friend is the best example. She liked MA very much at the beginning, but it totally changed through all the things she learned about these woman. Cause she realized the facts.
But thats not the topic...so let us go back to this. ;)


Imperial_Grounds

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #22 on: July 06, 2009, 02:28:09 PM »
@erzsi:
Well I always knew that both movies about MA were not realistic at all, but I thought the docudrama did quite well - the best so far -, yes it missed out on much and shows her in a good light but so did all books I read on her so far, which is not much, but I will go reading the books you suggested and see if I have to change my thoughts about her.

But I must agree she was not that much of a Queen - she cared too much for her own pleasure etc -, but I do think she simply did not know better and that is why she didn't do much for the people.

Offline Yelena Aleksandrovna

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 3730
    • View Profile
    • *Glitter Of The Past*
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #23 on: July 06, 2009, 07:21:33 PM »
Erszi:
I dislike Louis XVI, and his character, in my opinion he wasn't one of the best
french kings, but this is just my personal point of view,
that can be completely different than the yours, or different than the point of
view of the other memebers that have written, all of them worthy.
:-)

Offline Yelena Aleksandrovna

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 3730
    • View Profile
    • *Glitter Of The Past*
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #24 on: July 06, 2009, 07:23:58 PM »
Erzsi Excuse me, I wrote in a wrong way your name in the post below.
The majority of historical movies aren't very realistic

erzsi

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #25 on: July 06, 2009, 08:32:25 PM »
@erzsi:
Well I always knew that both movies about MA were not realistic at all, but I thought the docudrama did quite well - the best so far -, yes it missed out on much and shows her in a good light but so did all books I read on her so far, which is not much, but I will go reading the books you suggested and see if I have to change my thoughts about her.



Well sadly its not really the case for the docudrama.... :S Cause as said, they still represented the so silly rumor of the phimosis of the king which never existed, eg. Well the books i read didn´t. There are some books where you just have to read...you know, some people can´t read correctly and just read what they want to read. I don´t say you do..it was just an example...;) But in the book of Joan Haslip eg. you can find a lot of parts where its very clear that MA wasn´t this soo sweet angel. Also the dairies of Mme. Campan aren´t really trustfull. Cause the Madame loves to add her person dramatically way/view of a lot of tghings. And wanted to make the world believe in her points of MA. No matte if they were true or not. Maybe there is also to find surely some true elements, yes, but if you don´t now both sides MA+Louis and of other people around them to compare, its hard to figure out what is right. Like Élisabeth Vigée-Lebrun, she wrote in her dairy, that she was so amazed about MA skin...that she was talking in front of the queen etc, but after or "behind her back" and in privat, she wasn´t so founded of the queen. It was just a job she really need for her family, she queen wasn´t so gret in her opinion and also not really beautiful...:S The court overact MA a lot cause of her rank.... Cause i remember that her skin wasn´t the best after the pox, the scars she got were it seems "so bad" that Maria Theresia wanted to powder MA´s faces to cover it up.
And thanks, its nice that you will give a try for the books.




But I must agree she was not that much of a Queen - she cared too much for her own pleasure etc -, but I do think she simply did not know better and that is why she didn't do much for the people.

Yes sadly thats true. And thats a point a good queen should do... Not only care about her look or fashion and own well. And well as its for me more bad "excuse" for her behavior.
Cause as said she had her mother for the best example of a good ruler. And even if MA missed a lot of a good edjucation for her postion of the Daphine de France, the empress teached her her also in her letter to do the best/right and her sorrows which MA liked to overflow. Eg:::
>>> Indeed, she had recommended MA to behave in France like a Frenchwoman, but doesn´t mean with that, that she should not emulate the french habits. The mother in Vienna
came something bad to her ears, she clung on the hope, through exhortation, to be able to turn away the worst one. One hear, "that You bought bracelets for 250.000Livre, for this reason of her gainings disheveled and made debt." In the newspapers is " now only the speech of horse running, games of chance, and stayed awake all nights."
Not to last: Excursions with Count de Artois have done more grief to me,  as i forsee the consequences. In the long run this hunt for the pleasure will damage her health and her call.If you let drift yourself, I foresee big misfortune for you."One day you will recognise it, but then it will be too late.I wish not to survive this misfortune. "

>>>Sie hatte MA zwar empfohlen, sich in France wie eine Französin zu benehmen, hatte damit aber nicht gemeint, das sie französische Unsitten nacheifern sollte. Der Mutter in Wien kam schlimmes zu Ohren sie klammerte sich an die Hoffnung, durch Mahrnrufe, das schlimmste abwenden zu können. Man höre, "das Sie Armbänder für 250.000Livre gekauft, zu diesem Zweck Ihrer Einkünfte derangiert und Schulden gemacht haben." In den Zeitungen sei "jetzt nur noch von Pferderrennen, Hasardspiele, und Durchwachten Nächten die Rede." Nicht zu Letzt:  "Ausflüge mit Count de Artois haben mir um so mehr Kummer gemacht, als ich die Konsequenzen vorraus sehe. Auf die Dauer wird diese Jagd nach dem Vergnügen ihre Gesundheit und ihrem Ruf schaden. Wenn Sie sich treiben lassen, sehe ich großes Unglück für Sie voraus. "Eines Tages werden Sie es erkennen, aber dann wird es zu spät sein. Ich wünsche nicht dieses Unglück zu überleben."

From the Book "Maria Theresia-The great Habsburgerin-Franz Herre
« Last Edit: July 06, 2009, 08:35:19 PM by erzsi »

Imperial_Grounds

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #26 on: July 07, 2009, 10:54:34 AM »
Haslip's book is also on my list of wanted books.

But I guess we should go back to the topic, though I like discussing about it:p

Offline prinzheinelgirl

  • Graf
  • ***
  • Posts: 478
    • View Profile
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #27 on: July 08, 2009, 09:28:48 PM »
Hmmm - I so dislike Napoleon and IMHO, he wasn't even royal.....

I must say I find the discussion on Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette stimulating...... I do not dislike them and I have sympathy for both. But I also think that they didn't do things effectively as possible so that least some semblance of monarchy would be left despite France's many problems.  

Louis XVI - I think it was a mistake for him to support to American revolution. It was something that France could ill-afford and it wasn't a royalist thing to do, despite the rivalry with England. It certainly backfired on the French monarchy....

Marie Antoinette - I can excuse her faults at first due to but after she became a mother (when she supposedly 'matured').... it's been a little harder to explain them away (even if I still like her).  I do think her greatest mistake was alienating both the nobility and the masses.  If she had the support of either, things could've been much better. I understand that her being Austrian was against her from the start but she also certainly gave her enemies 'ammunition' to attack her. In that, she wasn't very wise.  On the other hand, the ceaseless criticisms from Maria Theresa is a big minus factor, IMHO. MT might have meant well but she was overly critical (even of the very small things that can be easily overlooked), was quite contrary in what she preached and what she did, and did not employ the best means/tactics to get through her messages/reproaches.
    

« Last Edit: July 08, 2009, 09:32:54 PM by prinzheinelgirl »
kindness is the magic elixir of love

erzsi

  • Guest
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #28 on: July 09, 2009, 11:29:39 AM »
Haslip's book is also on my list of wanted books.

But I guess we should go back to the topic, though I like discussing about it:p

Okay,back to Topic, but it was interesting our discussing ;)

Offline Romanov_fan

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4611
    • View Profile
Re: Do you dislike a French royal?
« Reply #29 on: July 14, 2009, 04:52:51 PM »
I think the issue with MA is she often gets romanticized and inaccuratly portrayed ( as she was in her lifetime, albeit then it was in negative ways), and it's hard to cut through all that and see MA as she actually was in historical reality. Obviously she had faults, but rather than good or bad, both of which labels can not describe her fully, I think she was both.