Pushkina
You are putting the cart before the horse.
The specific charges must first be laid. What crimes SPECIFICALLY do you believe are supported by the evidence you put out.
As I said before, those wishing to prosecute must first lay out the "indictment", that is the bill of charges, with the evidence to support them.
So please, no more evidence until you (plural meaning those wanting to prosecute) lay out the charges, then bring on the evidence. I will then create the bill of indictment, so the Defense team can respond directly.
i have worked as a human rights and war crimes researcher since 1980, for a variety of NGOs, the wiesenthal center, in conjunction with the helsinki commission (OSCE). through the 80-90s, i worked with other NGOs gathering war crimes evidence to proferred against saddam hussein and drafting the documentation (briefs and draft indictments) to be submitted with the evidence. i've worked collecting and detailing evidence of the rape camps and torture in bosnia. i was part of a team at the wiesenthal center to go back into german and rumanian archival documents to try and identify crimes and perpetrators at the trans-nistrian camps and draft the docs to be submitted to the rumanian prosecutors. most recently, i was invited back by NGOs concerned with making sure that saddam's crimes committed during the iraq-iran war against iranian civilians are detailed and included in the indictment being prepared against him.
all this to explain that i was trained to go about this process differently: first discover and identify the events to question, break them down (take verbal evidence; research /locate archival evidence) develop all lines and ONLY THEN can one decide specific charges to level and persons to accuse.
therefore, that is why i suggested events; not as an obstructionist means ("cart before the horse"). the head of the prosecution team would/should make note and collect them to include as part of their research.
however, as you are the FA, i suppose you are entitled to organise this adventure as you see fit. the way you propose makes this a much shorter and less profound exercise.
