I'm thinking that perhaps the birth year question may not be the best issue to deal with - it would lack depth, since there really are only speculations on both sides, with neither being able to conclusively say one way or another. I think the best road to take would be a topic with lots of conclusive information from different sources. There is tons of stuff on her as being head of the "reforming" faction at court. There really is no information about her early life, and really her life is only best documented from about 1529 on. You could indeed do something about her fall - but not directly on whether she was guilty or not, because I believe there is only one modern historian who believes she was actually guilty, with everyone else being completely certain she was innocent. You could still involve the adultery topic here by integrating it into a paper about her fall from grace, by taking one side or another about its causes. Out of anything else, this has probably the most information on it. A great resource in any event, would definitely be Eric Ives' The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn. Do you know if your school has access to Jstor? It's a database where you can access many journal articles (which of course make lighter and more condensed reading than books), and there are many, many on Anne Boleyn, in particular by Eric Ives, George Bernard, and Retha Warnicke. If you want a really good argument about Anne's fall, you can compare the views of Warnicke and contrast them with Ives - they are polar opposite, and both historians have written numerous articles back and forth fighting their viewpoints (Ives argues that a fallout between Cromwell and Anne over the closing of the Monasteries caused her fall, and Warnicke sticks to things like the deformed foetus theory). Personally, I feel Ives' position to be more solid, but that would be up to you to decide. For starters anyway, you can go to your library and search for the authors mentioned above, as well as also Alison Weir and David Starkey.
