Author Topic: Queen Victoria & Prince Albert--Photos and Information  (Read 316585 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

rosieposie

  • Guest
Re: Queen Victoria's bloomers...
« Reply #405 on: September 16, 2009, 04:29:40 AM »
When I read they were open crotch, a few adult things went through my head.   No wonder she had so many children, what with her and Bertie sneaking off to a dark corner and spending a good quickie any time of the day.

(sorry just had to say it).

Offline Grace

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 3126
    • View Profile
Re: Queen Victoria's bloomers...
« Reply #406 on: September 16, 2009, 06:23:28 AM »
I very much doubt that would have happened.  There would have been servants everywhere to begin with.  Also, the Prince Consort was never called 'Bertie'.  Their son, the Prince of Wales, went by that name.

senorita

  • Guest
Re: Queen Victoria's bloomers...
« Reply #407 on: September 16, 2009, 07:32:45 AM »
its really nice to read this news.. and pleasure to buy this kind of things too.. its precious...

aor

  • Guest
Re: Queen Victoria's bloomers...
« Reply #408 on: September 17, 2009, 09:06:36 AM »
I very much doubt that would have happened.  There would have been servants everywhere to begin with.  Also, the Prince Consort was never called 'Bertie'.  Their son, the Prince of Wales, went by that name.

.......however, it seems as if both did enjoy 'fun in the bedroom'...... ;) and yes, Prince Albert was never called Bertie!

Offline Yelena Aleksandrovna

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 3730
    • View Profile
    • *Glitter Of The Past*
Re: Queen Victoria's bloomers...
« Reply #409 on: September 18, 2009, 06:01:48 PM »
.......however, it seems as if both did enjoy 'fun in the bedroom'...... ;) and yes, Prince Albert was never called Bertie!
Of course that they enjoyed their time, their several children shows this.

Offline carl fraley

  • Boyar
  • **
  • Posts: 228
  • Honor and Fidelity
    • View Profile
Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #410 on: September 20, 2009, 03:44:54 AM »
When HM Queen Victoria Was born in 1819 she would have been Her Royal Highness Princess Alexandra Victoria of Kent, Princess of Great Britain and Ireland, but at the same token wouldn't she have also been styled and titled Princess of Hanover, Duchess of Brunswick and Lüneburg as a male line grandchild of King George III as well??? Just a thought????

If that's true wouldn't that have applied to HRH PRincess Mary Adelaide Duchess of Teck and HRH The Duke of Cambridge? Or Did that Not Apply after the Seperation of the Crowns?

I don't see how it would have b/c the Princes/Princess of Hannover continued to use the Title of PRince/Princess of United Kingdom of Great Britian and Ireland after the seperation??

Just a Thought?Anyone know?

darius

  • Guest
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #411 on: September 20, 2009, 09:30:07 AM »
Through marriage she would also have been a Duchess of Saxony.

Offline carl fraley

  • Boyar
  • **
  • Posts: 228
  • Honor and Fidelity
    • View Profile
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #412 on: September 20, 2009, 08:35:59 PM »
yeah i knew that but forgot to include that :) Thanks, more interested in the Hannover Connection

CHRISinUSA

  • Guest
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #413 on: September 21, 2009, 08:16:10 AM »
You are both correct.  The separation of the Crowns upon Victoria's succession to the British throne had no effect on her Hanovarian titles, as those titles were held by virtue of hereditary.  As a male-line granddaughter of a King of Hanover, Victoria bore the titles of Princess of Hanover and Duchess of Brunswick and Lunenburg. She also held the titles of Princess of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha and Duchess in Saxony etc. as the wife of Prince Albert.

Victoria's Hanovarian titles ended with her death (they did not descend to her children) because Hanover operated under Salic law and titles did not descend through female lines.  However, the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha and Saxony titles did continue as they were passed through Albert.

Offline mcdnab

  • Boyar
  • **
  • Posts: 217
    • View Profile
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #414 on: September 21, 2009, 09:04:40 AM »
And in addition to Victoria - Princess Augusta of Cambridge, Princess Mary Adelaide of Cambridge and George 2nd Duke of Cambridge were also entitled to those styles. The titles did not descend to George of Cambridge's children as his marriage was in controvention of the Royal Marriages Act and would also have been morganatic under Hanoverian traditions.

Offline Marc

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4365
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
    • View Profile
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #415 on: September 23, 2009, 08:34:48 AM »
When HM Queen Victoria Was born in 1819 she would have been Her Royal Highness Princess Alexandra Victoria of Kent, Princess of Great Britain and Ireland, but at the same token wouldn't she have also been styled and titled Princess of Hanover, Duchess of Brunswick and Lüneburg as a male line grandchild of King George III as well??? Just a thought????

If that's true wouldn't that have applied to HRH PRincess Mary Adelaide Duchess of Teck and HRH The Duke of Cambridge? Or Did that Not Apply after the Seperation of the Crowns?

I don't see how it would have b/c the Princes/Princess of Hannover continued to use the Title of PRince/Princess of United Kingdom of Great Britian and Ireland after the seperation??

Just a Thought?Anyone know?

She was born Alexandrina Victoria...

Offline Yelena Aleksandrovna

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 3730
    • View Profile
    • *Glitter Of The Past*
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #416 on: September 23, 2009, 03:51:48 PM »
What complicated this topics about the correct titles of several royals!!
I only knew that she was Queen of England and Empress of India ;-)

Offline mcdnab

  • Boyar
  • **
  • Posts: 217
    • View Profile
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #417 on: September 24, 2009, 10:25:33 AM »
Don't mean to nit pic but i will - She was NOT Queen of England - there is no such title and hasn't been for about three hundred years (unless you are a jacobite supporter of the Stuart succession).
Victoria was Queen of The United Kingdom of Great Britain, Empress of India etc....

Offline Yelena Aleksandrovna

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 3730
    • View Profile
    • *Glitter Of The Past*
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #418 on: September 24, 2009, 08:10:14 PM »
Well, excuse me for my mistake, I was refferring to the UK of GB

Offline carl fraley

  • Boyar
  • **
  • Posts: 228
  • Honor and Fidelity
    • View Profile
Re: Queen Victoria's Full Title At Death
« Reply #419 on: September 25, 2009, 02:27:06 AM »
When HM Queen Victoria Was born in 1819 she would have been Her Royal Highness Princess Alexandra Victoria of Kent, Princess of Great Britain and Ireland, but at the same token wouldn't she have also been styled and titled Princess of Hanover, Duchess of Brunswick and Lüneburg as a male line grandchild of King George III as well??? Just a thought????

If that's true wouldn't that have applied to HRH PRincess Mary Adelaide Duchess of Teck and HRH The Duke of Cambridge? Or Did that Not Apply after the Seperation of the Crowns?

I don't see how it would have b/c the Princes/Princess of Hannover continued to use the Title of PRince/Princess of United Kingdom of Great Britian and Ireland after the seperation??

Just a Thought?Anyone know?

She was born Alexandrina Victoria...




Yeah, A typo on my Part..> Thanks :)