THe wonderful quote from the gentleman.
@Chantelle How would you know? According to you, the last photograph of her was taken when she was 23 years old. Do you actually have the interest to have completed hundreds of photograph comparisons? Have you taken time to do this yourself or do you allow others to tell you the story? Do you know anything about time lapse photography? Clearly in Italian, The newspaper article tell us of her! There are documents that identify both Olga and Marie in the Chambers of Pope Pius XII at The Vatican. Have you seen any of these thing? What books and credibility to you have on this subject?
It is apparent that you know no other languages in order to have broadened your knowledge of who was assisting these people, where they traveled to or what actually happened. How many archives have you visited? Have you traveled to The Vatican, Hamburg, Italy? Do you have any royal family friends that you interviewed? Have you translated documents from five different languages to identify the reality of this family? There was a covert operation in order to allow all of them to disappear. Is "The File On The Tsar" in your library? I suggest you read it. Go also to The Houghton Library on the Harvard Campus. Have some respect for those that have researched and investigated a lot more than you!
All the Western Hemisphere media is aware of this book. The ROC, the ROCOR, The Vatican, House of Romanov, The House of Windsor, The Russian Nobility Association, The Romanoff Family Association, BBC, Pravda, Prince Nicholas Romanov, Snithsonian, Princess Marie Vladimirovna. Telemundo, Canadian Broadcast Corp., Patriarch Kirill, and many others have all been personally notified of this publication. Of course I can not answer him asI'm blocked.
This sounds like the person who posted for a while under the Amazon book reviews of
Resurrection of the Romanovs under the name of "Robert Crouch". He was proclaiming that a new blockbuster book was right on the verge of being published that would reveal vast stores of evidence from southern European archives that would prove to "all the world" that the real survival story had heretofore been untold. Of course, that was almost two years ago. The blockbuster book has thus far failed to appear.
Those reviews also were full of claims that the DNA test results, despite being consistently replicated using multiple samples by four highly-reputable labs in several countries, were flawed. The reasons given for the flawed results ranged from a conspiracy by the British government to bribery and fraud in all the labs to switched samples to faulty testing techniques to misinterpreted results. But my personal favorite was a poster named "HarryB" who threw a real monkey wrench into the boiling cauldron of crazy. He claimed that the DNA tests
were correct but the reason that Anderson's DNA did not match Romanov DNA was that Anastasia was a changeling -- that the real daughter had died shortly after birth and, for some mysterious reason, another infant had been substituted in her place. (He never could explain why Nicholas and Alexandra would have been so desperate to hide the death of a fourth daughter -- who under no scenario could become a factor in the succession -- that they would raise a non-Romanov as their own child.)
The tidal forces of absurdity that ebb and flow around the murders of the Imperial family are seemingly eternal and certainly impervious to science and reason. But they make for a roaring good time if you can approach it with the proper sense of humor. If you try to approach it as part of a sane discussion of history, well . . . good luck.