... I just hope they get the correct remains of GD Ella...
Which begs the questions: Is this really Ella's body?
There was the controversial testing done at Stanford University in 2004 with an alleged finger of Ella that was obtained by Bishop Anthony Grabbe during the opening of her coffin in Jerusalem in 1982. The DNA did not match. The Stanford team concluded the remains of the Imperial Family were not authentic. The counter-argument is that the finger isn't really from Ella.
Yes, that finger was definitely NOT Ella's. Margarita Nelipa and I wrote an article about that study back in 2005, and we talk about the finger extensively. It was a completely incompetent work. https://www.academia.edu/7316582/_Claims_That_the_Remains_of_the_Russian_Imperial_Family_Are_Still_Missing_Or_Are_They_Sorting_Out_the_Facts_from_the_Fiction._Helen_Azar_and_Margarita_Nelipa
Yes, that article by the two of you was a solid refutation of the shoddy "science" of the Stanford team.
And yes, the finger is compromised as a source of uncontaminated DNA for such studies.
However, not everyone would go so far as to declare that it is not Grand Duchess Elizabeth's.
In his own article refuting the Stanford study, Dr. Parson, in the second paragraph, declares that he does not doubt that it is hers, but that it had been handled too much.
He also notes that even in the Stanford tests some strings of the finger's DNA did match Prince Philip's.
http://www.searchfoundationinc.org/no-reason-to-doubt-the-romanov-dna-testingFor our part, we have known the Grabbes for decades. Fr. George Grabbe, subsequently Bishop Gregory, was the Chancellor / Secretary of the Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad for many, many years.
His son, Archimandrite Anthony, subsequently Bishop Anthony (the one in question here), was Head of the ROCA's Ecclesiastical Mission in Jerusalem for many years and responsible for the convent where St. Elizabeth's remains were kept.
He personally opened the coffins of her and Sister Barbara at the time of their glorification, when their relics were transferred from the crypt to the main church. It was he who removed the finger, and other relics, and brought them to NYC.
So the "chain of custody" is pretty straightforward in this case. We ourselves saw her finger in his care in NY not long before he died.
It's also important to remember that long before DNA studies were even heard of, people had no idea that they were somehow 'contaminating' a specimen, or compromising it for a future, still uninvented scientific process.
That is one reason why the Otsu kerchief did not yield any useful results -- too much handling by too many people in the course of many years.
But who would've thought?!