These days I have been send several messages on my Czech blog that Anna Andersson was not Anastasia Nikolaevna..... but Maria Nikolaevna!
Here is a whole blog dedicated to photo comparison of the two (often, ironically, using wrong pictures), if you just scroll down http://tschaikovska.blogspot.cz/
O_o I always thought that all AA's supporters were fully convinced that AA was actually AN!! ;-) When checking the blog I was expecting to find some kind of explanation about this "new change of identity" of AA but could not find anything (except the photo comparison), I wonder if among the several messages that you received in your blog this person said something more besides the photo comparison. After all, they are contradicting AA's original claim! :-P Anyways, for what I've been reading in the previous posts I see that it is not the first time that Maria´s photos were used for making photo comparison with AA, I think that some of AA's supporters got tired trying to find some likeness between two women who were totally different.
This reminds me a lot me the photo comparison done for Maria Martí, at first they start using Maria's photos and at least they make a comparison betwen María Martí, Anastasia and AA!!! Everything is good for them to "prove" their point.
I have been swamped by messages and photo comparisons and now I am SO sick and tired of him.... He insists that EVERY information there is on Anna being Francizska is useless because the only photo of Francizska was retouched and made to look like Anna, when in fact she didn´t look like her at all..... Sigh. I am leaving that conversation. Sometimes there is no point.
Unfortunately, in the majority of the cases happens the same, this is to talk to deaf ears.