Earlier I've been fascinated by the fact that Christian IX might have delayed appointing a liberal cabinet untill his wife passed away, because he had come to the throne by her right and she was arch-conservative. Recently I also learned this:
I have read that she [Princess Marie] had an influence in making Christian IX appoint the first liberal goverment in Denmark in 1901. Prior to that the old king would only appoint conservative cabinets, eventhough they at one time only had 8 seats out of 114 in the parlament.
A french magazine called him; Inventeur de l`art de gouverner avec la minorité.
Christian IX's and Prime Minister Estrup's argument for their course was apparantly not just Montesquieu's division of powers, but also that the Constitution of 1866 gave no pre-eminence to the lower chamber, the Popular Assembly (Folketinget), but made the upper chamber, the Conservative bastion the Territorial Assembly (Landstinget, with a rather limited suffrage and several government appointed members) its equal. As long as the Conservatives had a majority in Landstinget, they ruled with a majority, one could argue. The illussion broke in 1899 when 8 Landsting Members of the Conservative Party, among them Denmark's largest landowner Count Mogens Krag-Juel-Vind-Frijs and former Prime Minister Baron Tage Reedtz-Thott, in an effort to unite the bourgeois side against the Socialists, bolted and formed the Free Conservative Party, which supported the Liberals and made the ensuing change to a parliamentary system with lower chamber supremacy in 1901 possible.
I return to this topic over and over again, because I never get over the fact that Denmark, which seems to have rivalled Britain as the incarnation of political stableness in Christian IX's time (and still does, of course), actually was governed by provisionary laws (Folketinget did not consent to many law bills and both chambers' consent was necessary) for much of that period! Perhaps that was indeed why the royals thought Denmark so stable...
It was also interesting to read in the very radical Danish Professor Georg Brandes' reports from Berlin from this period, that the Prussian nobility still was going strong, producing great leaders like Bismarck and holding many powerful positions in society, while the Danish nobility "since long had ceased to be a true aristocracy". Count Krag-Juel-Vind-Frijs and Baron Reedtz-Thott were perhaps the exceptions?