No Stalin, no Hitler?

[Michelle]

My (lack of) god Michelle, we agree!

Wow!  That's a first!


Lass, Britain sounds like it has much more respect for life than America does.  What are the government's views on abortion over there?

[Lass]

Lass, Britain sounds like it has much more respect for life than America does.  What are the government's views on abortion over there?

'Fraid Britain has nothing over the US...not that I know of anyway, as regards abortion. It goes on all the time, and, as a subject, is generally treated with careless indifference. We have around 150,000 abortions per year or something. To me, though, that seems to contradict both British and EU laws. If the legality of abortion was questioned, however, it would be the law that would be amended, not the carryings on in our hospitals.

[LisaDavidson]

Lass and Michelle: You are off topic. I'm sure there are places on the net where you can discuss topics such as Schivo, abortion, and euthenasia. This is not one of them.

The topic on this thread is who was worse, Hitler or Stalin. Kindly return to topic.

[Lass]

'Tis interesting (?) to note that this is your first contribution to the thread, Lisa.

It was me who started the thread, and also me who originally went "off topic". I don't consider it to be a crime. If anyone wishes to post on the original issue, I'm sure they will not feel barred from doing so.

[Moonlight_Densetsu]

Well I'd say Stalin was worse he knew full well what he was doing and just didn't care. No emotions at all. Hitler honestly thought what he was doing was right, he was a mad man so he is excused. Stalin knew killing people was wrong but he didn't care. Hitler thought it best for Germany and the world he was just mad a wack job. Stalin was a communist which means he should see all men as equal he knew that, didn't care. Hitler thought with all his heart the Germans were the master race and that they should inherit the world. So my vote is for stalin who expressed no remorse. Hitler thought what the Japanese were doing in China was wrong so that says alot.

[Lass]

Well I'd say Stalin was worse he knew full well what he was doing and just didn't care.

Neither did Hitler care. A man who carried out the deeds he did could not really care, could he?

Hitler ... was a mad man so he is excused.

I myself, for one, grant Hitler no excuse.

Hitler thought with all his heart the Germans were the master race and that they should inherit the world.

Does not excuse him. Both Stalin and Hitler killed indirectly/directly out of their own greed for other things.

So my vote is for stalin who expressed no remorse.

Did Hitler express remorse? I don't remember. Maybe you're right, but I didn't think so.

[Moonlight_Densetsu]

What I mean is Hitler did not see what he was doing was wrong which means he had no concept of right and wrong. It does not excuse him..I should not have said that, but I'm saying basically Hitler was crazy he thought what he was doing was a good thing. Stalin knew he was wrong didn't care witch makes him something more sinister then a person who thinks hes doing the world a favor.

[LisaDavidson]

'Tis interesting (?) to note that this is your first contribution to the thread, Lisa.

It was me who started the thread, and also me who originally went "off topic". I don't consider it to be a crime. If anyone wishes to post on the original issue, I'm sure they will not feel barred from doing so.

I believe you are mistaken as to this being my first contribution - I recall chiming in quite early with my opinion. (I recall being the first to reply.) By sure number of people murdered, Stalin "wins" IMHO.

It's not a crime to be off topic, and don't recall I did anything but ask you to remain on topic. My reason is, as moderators, we want to keep the discussion going for everyone. Not everyone may be comfortable with a discussion about Hitler and Stalin turning into a discussion about Schiavo and abortion.

[Vera_Figner]

Well I'd say Stalin was worse he knew full well what he was doing and just didn't care. No emotions at all. Hitler honestly thought what he was doing was right, he was a mad man so he is excused. Stalin knew killing people was wrong but he didn't care. Hitler thought it best for Germany and the world he was just mad a wack job. Stalin was a communist which means he should see all men as equal he knew that, didn't care. Hitler thought with all his heart the Germans were the master race and that they should inherit the world. So my vote is for stalin who expressed no remorse. Hitler thought what the Japanese were doing in China was wrong so that says alot.

Stalin was a diagnosed paranoid. Not excusing him, but I am not sure he truly comprehended right from wrong in every instance.

[Vera_Figner]

I believe you are mistaken as to this being my first contribution - I recall chiming in quite early with my opinion. (I recall being the first to reply.) By sure number of people murdered, Stalin "wins" IMHO.

It's not a crime to be off topic, and don't recall I did anything but ask you to remain on topic. My reason is, as moderators, we want to keep the discussion going for everyone. Not everyone may be comfortable with a discussion about Hitler and Stalin turning into a discussion about Schiavo and abortion.

Thank you Lisa.

[pinklady]

I would have to say in my opinion Stalin was the worst, he had more people killed and he had more decades to be in operation.

Now Hitler, the mad Austrian. He was evil and wicked too,  as he killed innocent people for being a different race, religion, way of life etc,
However I have to say, he only had 13 years, oh my goodness, imagine if he had more time.

So Stalin wins cos he had more time, but that's only cos Hitler didnt, so who knows what would have happened, thankfully he didnt finish his "agenda".  

[lexi4]

I believe you are mistaken as to this being my first contribution - I recall chiming in quite early with my opinion. (I recall being the first to reply.) By sure number of people murdered, Stalin "wins" IMHO.

It's not a crime to be off topic, and don't recall I did anything but ask you to remain on topic. My reason is, as moderators, we want to keep the discussion going for everyone. Not everyone may be comfortable with a discussion about Hitler and Stalin turning into a discussion about Schiavo and abortion.

Thank you Lisa

[LisaDavidson]

Dear Vera and Lexi 4:

You're welcome! Happy posting!

Lisa

[Lass]

I believe you are mistaken as to this being my first contribution - I recall chiming in quite early with my opinion. (I recall being the first to reply.) By sure number of people murdered, Stalin "wins" IMHO.

It's not a crime to be off topic, and don't recall I did anything but ask you to remain on topic. My reason is, as moderators, we want to keep the discussion going for everyone. Not everyone may be comfortable with a discussion about Hitler and Stalin turning into a discussion about Schiavo and abortion.

Fair enough. I will stay with the original topic, if you like. I'm sorry about my mistake with regards your post; I didn't see it. And I didn't realise you were a moderator until after I had posted.

So Stalin wins cos he had more time, but that's only cos Hitler didnt, so who knows what would have happened, thankfully he didnt finish his "agenda".

If he had been given time to finish, I dread to think of the results ... :-/

[rskkiya]

This topic is rather pointless--I am the most evil person on the planet!

[glb]MWHAAAHAAAHAAA[/glb]

fear me!
rskkiya

the red
liberal
expat brit