Author Topic: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4  (Read 66540 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JonC

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #90 on: July 14, 2005, 11:02:29 PM »
Actually,Princess Alice could have given birth prematurely by a couple of weeks to a month (a possibility)

If she gave birth on June 6th, 1872 it was the biginning of the month. Full term would mean she would have gotten pregnant no earlier than October 6th. From October 6th to December 12 is still closer to two months not three. That fetus had to be too small to notice...just a thought. JonC.

Finelly

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #91 on: July 14, 2005, 11:32:58 PM »
First pregnancy, I didn't feel the baby kick until about 18 weeks.

Second, at about 16 weeks.

Third and fourth, at about 13 weeks.


Inquiring_Mind

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #92 on: July 15, 2005, 03:15:03 PM »
It could even have been a bit of "wishful thinking" on Alice's part.


Offline Kimberly

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 3143
  • Loyaulte me lie
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #93 on: July 15, 2005, 05:00:26 PM »
Or gas (and i am NOT being facetious)
Member of the Richard III Society

Finelly

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #94 on: July 15, 2005, 05:06:47 PM »
You are so right, Kimberly.  If one adores having babies and is pregnant as many times as Alice, one will interpret lots of things as having to do with the baby inside you.

Offline RealAnastasia

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 1890
  • I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #95 on: July 15, 2005, 06:06:59 PM »
Quote
First pregnancy, I didn't feel the baby kick until about 18 weeks.

Second, at about 16 weeks.

Third and fourth, at about 13 weeks.



I didn't know this, Finelly. Thank you for sharing. To know how a mother feel their babies inside them...Nothing better than asking mothers themselves. And since Alix was not Alice first child, I think it was possible than she could felt Alix kicking inside her, after all.
However, I don't know where Noel read this.

RealAnastasia.

Offline AGRBear

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 6611
  • The road to truth is the best one to travel.
    • View Profile
    • Romanov's  Russia
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #96 on: July 15, 2005, 06:13:49 PM »
Babies kicking???

I'm going to have to turn back the pages to discover how noses [see subject line] turned into babies.  ;)

AGRBear
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by AGRBear »
"What is true by lamplight is not always true by sunlight."

Joubert, Pensees, No. 152

Finelly

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #97 on: July 15, 2005, 06:21:33 PM »
Bear - you don't KNOW?  Well, it's obvious to the REST of us.....

But since you don't know, we won't tell.  You'll have to figure it out for yourself.

Hopefully, you will do it before babies turn into toenails.....

JonC

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #98 on: July 19, 2005, 09:40:40 AM »
Greg,

I haven't forgotten the situation. Yesterday I was able to go to the library and put an order in for the books in question and I will get back to this issue as soon as I get them. I have reviewed my notes and so far I stand by what I've said. JonC.

Finelly

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #99 on: July 20, 2005, 09:47:19 AM »
Well, I got my copy right here, and Greg's citation is correct.  It's right there.....

lexi4

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #100 on: July 20, 2005, 03:48:29 PM »
Coming in clueless...what citation is correct   ???

Finelly

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #101 on: July 20, 2005, 04:57:10 PM »
The one about Alice feeling the baby moving.

lexi4

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #102 on: July 21, 2005, 12:22:55 AM »
Was this the baby she miscarried or am I on the wrong thread. ;D ;D

JonC

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #103 on: July 21, 2005, 12:06:15 PM »
Finelly,

Could you ellaborate on what you found? Thanks.JonC.

Finelly

  • Guest
Re: Re: Anna Anderson - Physical Evidence and DNA #4
« Reply #104 on: July 21, 2005, 12:15:54 PM »
I appear to have the same copy of the book that Greg does.  

Greg said:  "The letter is indeed, as I said, quoted on page 175 of Gerard Noel’s “Princes Alice: Queen Victoria’s Forgotten Daughter,” trade paperback edition published by Constable in London in 1985.  You will find it on the first page of Chapter Eleven, page 175, on the 14th line down from the beginning sentence. "

It's right there............