Well now, it was and is quite common to blame the wife for the husband's strying- gay or hetero straying. It is totally wrong to do so, I believe, but it does happenFor obvious reasons, I am curious about is what sort of relationships [gay, that is] Ernst did have? Nothing long term it would seem, no one taken under his patronage [unlike Luwig II of Bavaria for example]. No staff, aides or otherwise court figures.
It would seem to me his interest was pretty typical as "just a good time" and not to be taken too terribly seriously, as has been described in various ways here.
Early photographs of obviuos male bonding are fairly easy to find, I have several volumes of them myself. But, all the editors and commentators take pains to note that the photographs DO NOT neccessarily imply a sexual relationship, it was simply very coomon for men to have a closer bond with their male friends than hteir own wives. One can see it even today, particularly in men's somewhat obbsessive interest in sports- where homosexuality is still quite taboo [but of course exists anyway].
So, who were Ernst "lads"?
I have always been a bit sceptical about a "stable boy in the palace bedroom " story, that would an unlikely rendezvous, just asking to be discovered. In the stable perhps....but not in the palace.
As has been clearly demonstrated in todays royal carry-ons, such behavior is still quite common, and a lot remains hidden, in spite of what does leak out, if that is a proper way of describing "shouting it from the rooftops" [media].
We will most likely never know the truth about all this, it not the material for love poems or even nasty widespread gossip.
Ernest's reputation can be done no harm, his achievements, like Ludwigs overshadow any small "scandal".
Cheers,
Robert