Author Topic: Stuart portraiture  (Read 16305 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ilyala

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #15 on: July 17, 2005, 08:12:20 AM »
mary 2nd, daughter of james 2nd with her husband william the 3rd who was through his mother, mary, grandchild of charles 1st...



...and a detail...



....and her sister anne, the last stuart ruler of england:


ilyala

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #16 on: July 17, 2005, 08:14:57 AM »
the son of james 2nd, 'the old pretender'



his son, 'the young pretender'. aka 'bonnie prince charlie',




....that's all i could find... if you want me to search for the consorts, just tell me ;)
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by ilyala »

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #17 on: July 18, 2005, 06:13:08 AM »
Ilyala. Wonderful pictures. Thank you very much. these of ancient scots are particularily fine.

Bluetoria. I did'nt have this of Charles II. Imposing. I don't want this in colour. Just as it is here. It's fantastic.
Thank you very much.

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2005, 06:19:45 AM »
Genealogical tree of Henriette de France


cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #19 on: July 18, 2005, 06:24:43 AM »

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #20 on: July 18, 2005, 06:26:39 AM »

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #21 on: July 18, 2005, 06:30:08 AM »

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #22 on: July 18, 2005, 06:31:13 AM »

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #23 on: July 18, 2005, 06:34:52 AM »

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #24 on: July 18, 2005, 06:36:36 AM »

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #25 on: July 18, 2005, 06:49:27 AM »
One of the queens that have been more portrayed, and by who!  She was obviously SMART. Although ambassadors said her beauty was not real. (Too feeble constitution, thig arms and black teeth that portraits don't show. She leaved England when the Revolution and dye in France. Poor Charles. We know where and how he loosed his head

ilyala

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #26 on: July 18, 2005, 02:29:58 PM »
she wasn't very beautiful, but intelligent. but i don't think she used her intelligence well. i also think she influenced charles too much and she was one of the reasons he lost his head

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #27 on: July 19, 2005, 04:38:54 AM »
I agree, my friend. I think she was quite wise but  a few negligent. She seems to have been one of this persons who shows their true value only in danger and relaxed when things went easier.

I would like to know more curiosities of her inteme life, her relationships .

I think she was an intelligent woman just in the conflictive moments of the revolution. From being a funny, frivole woman, inmediately she became a good general, dealing with troops, an important support to the absent Charles from London. so she was wise leaving the country in the just moment, avoiding Cromwell ships which were an obstacle to gain France.
She saw bullets to fall very near. Intelligent too in conquering the love of Charles, for when she arrived, she didn't deserve his attention, being young charles engaged in an extrange platonic affaire with his close favorite Buckinham. She was patient, and she win. So that Charles arrived to love her really, and very much. Her marriage was succesfull. she was not an impressive beauty, but pretty and funny. That is another aspect i like in this personnage. She must have had a quite great sense of humour and been amusing woman. She enjoyed particularly the company of dwarfs. She had a lot. So I deduce she loved to laugh

ilyala

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #28 on: July 19, 2005, 01:03:35 PM »
the marriage started as a conflict between her catholic beliefs and charles' advisors. at some point charles even ordered her companions be sent home because he thought they were a bad influence. that almost started a conflict with france

but they overcame that :). i wonder how they managed to get through their differences

cantacuzene

  • Guest
Re: Stuart portraiture
« Reply #29 on: July 20, 2005, 04:13:39 AM »
Of course. Catholic Stuart consorts were not beloved in England. Protestants put on them injuries, plots, lies.acusing them of papist agents. Over all. the main fear was the education of the heirs having catholic mothers. For the restauration of Catholicisme would be intolerable for protestant nobility who had too much to loose if a monarch convert into papist.