Author Topic: Anne Boleyn  (Read 299875 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GrandDuchessAndrea

  • Guest
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #315 on: December 29, 2010, 02:58:21 PM »
Found this labeled as Anne-- I find that suspicious, first--the ruff she wears is plainly in the style of the later 1500s, when her daughter Elizabeth was queen, and secondly, her face looks too different to be in fact the personage it is labeled as.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Queen_Anne_Boleyn_2.jpg
What do you think?

boleynfan

  • Guest
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #316 on: December 29, 2010, 10:39:00 PM »
Found this labeled as Anne-- I find that suspicious, first--the ruff she wears is plainly in the style of the later 1500s, when her daughter Elizabeth was queen, and secondly, her face looks too different to be in fact the personage it is labeled as.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Queen_Anne_Boleyn_2.jpg
What do you think?

Clearly not a contemporary portrait.  I have seen this one before though..

Offline Kimberly

  • Moderator
  • Velikye Knyaz
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
  • Loyaulte me lie
    • View Profile
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #317 on: December 30, 2010, 12:25:07 AM »
Its quite lovely but we have discussed this portrait on these boards somewhere.
it was painted by Frans Pourbus
« Last Edit: December 30, 2010, 12:26:58 AM by Kimberly »
Member of the Richard III Society

Offline Suzanne

  • Graf
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
    • View Profile
    • Carolyn Harris Royal Historian
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #318 on: April 13, 2013, 01:10:25 PM »

Selencia

  • Guest
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #319 on: October 26, 2013, 10:16:46 PM »
In looking at all the portraits of all the wives someone said that by modern standards Anne is the most attractive. I tend to disagree and think Anne of Cleves is #1 with Jane Seymour being last on the list.
I was trying to read Starkey's book on the six wives but he is too misogynistic and attributes actions and thoughts to Anne that he has no way of knowing about. One that immediately comes to mind is that Anne assured Henry that his 1527 arguments against his marriage to Wolsey's counsel would be successful. According to Starkey everything was Anne's fault.

Offline Suzanne

  • Graf
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
    • View Profile
    • Carolyn Harris Royal Historian
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #320 on: November 19, 2013, 11:11:52 AM »
New book on the Boleyn women - lots of info on Anne's aunts and female cousins

http://www.royalhistorian.com/the-boleyn-women-by-elizabeth-norton-review/

Offline Horock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #321 on: December 04, 2013, 05:46:44 AM »
The chapel shown in the photograph is actually St Peter's Church, Hever.

Offline Suzanne

  • Graf
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
    • View Profile
    • Carolyn Harris Royal Historian
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #322 on: January 02, 2014, 11:42:57 AM »
Has anyone else read "In the Footsteps of Anne Boleyn" - it covers over 70 places that Anne may have visited over the course of her life

http://www.royalhistorian.com/in-the-footsteps-of-anne-boleyn-by-sarah-morris-and-natalie-grueninger-review/

Offline lady

  • Boyar
  • **
  • Posts: 131
    • View Profile
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #323 on: May 11, 2014, 11:55:16 AM »

Anne Boleyn from an old Spanish magazine

Offline GDLynn

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 54
  • AnastasiaNRfan
    • View Profile
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #324 on: September 22, 2015, 11:33:39 PM »
Has anyone seen the "new" Anne Boleyn Picture? They are claiming its her at 14.

http://www.thereddotgallery.com/national-trust-blickling-exhibition/an-early-portrait-of-anne-boleyn/

Things that I think are odd, the style of hood seems off and it seem WAY to much like the "B" portrait (my avatar). Thoughts?

 

Offline Kimberly

  • Moderator
  • Velikye Knyaz
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
  • Loyaulte me lie
    • View Profile
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #325 on: September 26, 2015, 01:20:59 PM »
There is something definitely " off " about that portrait. It looks very naive for one thing. Would be interesting to know wether the portrait has been dated by art specialists wouldn't it?
Thanks for posting it GDLynn, very interesting.
Member of the Richard III Society

Offline Kimberly

  • Moderator
  • Velikye Knyaz
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
  • Loyaulte me lie
    • View Profile
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #326 on: May 08, 2016, 03:36:44 AM »
Well there are masses of good books out there to enjoy.
Six Wives of Henry VIII by David Starkey is excellent and imo the best out of a choice of Antonia Fraser and Alison Weir.
For Catherine of Aragon, my go to book is " Catherine of Aragon, Henry's Spanish Queen" by Giles Tremlett.
For Anne Boleyn, no Tudor bookshelf is complete without " The Life And Death of Anne Boleyn", by Eric Ives.
So there is a starter for you.x
Member of the Richard III Society

Offline TimM

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 1940
    • View Profile
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #327 on: July 20, 2016, 04:11:20 AM »
I heard about an incident that allegedly happened in the late 19th Century.

A guard was on duty at the Tower Of London, when he saw the figure of a woman approaching him.  He had no idea who she was or what she was doing there.  He was about to challenge her, when he noticed that she had no head!

The accounts vary as to what happened to that poor guard.  Some say he dropped dead of shock, others say he went mad with fear.  Of course, this whole incident may be just an urban legend.

Poor Anne Boleyn has supposedly haunted the Tower Of London for almost 500 years now.  No doubt there are many stories like this.
Cats: You just gotta love them!

Offline CeridwenLynne

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: Anne Boleyn
« Reply #328 on: December 15, 2019, 11:24:25 AM »
Anne Boleyn for me is the most interesting of Henry’s wives. I’ll start off by saying that I don’t think she was guilty of the things Henry accused her of like witchcraft and adultery. She was an intelligent woman and very ambitious for a woman of her time. She was outspoken, sharp-witted, and knew how to use her assets to get what she wanted. I think Henry did love her at first but when she failed to produce a son he tired of her and decided to get rid of her for political reasons.