Saraelizabethii: the FS photo you are speaking about was HEAVILY retouched in order to make it to be almost identical to AA. I showed it to an expert anthropologue and forensic senior, and at first, he believed it was an AN photo...Since it was retouched to be similar to AA and AA was similar to AN, by transitive character, the pic is similar to AN! When he said it to me I must laugh ....After a while, he realized that the photo have been retouched. He noticed it since the FS face in them were too withe.
And don't forget that German judges in the last trial for AA's identity, said that the two pics that were presented by Doris Wingender were retouched (experts found it) and rejected them as evidence. Even parts of the woman clothes in the pic were drawn over it. The judge made a grin when he saw them.
We only have ONE pic of FS less retouched than the others where she is much less similar to AA than the other two. But even this one was retouched. We have not an original pic of her. That's the true...Nevertheless, even in the three retouched versions, the shape of AA and FS nose, eyes and mouth are different. Of course, if someone wanted to make us believe that AA was FS he or she must have pic someone at least very similar to her, not someone totally different. Some people when they saw AA for the first time, accorded that she was similar to FS, but they also said: It's only a slight ressemblance. She is not Fanziska.
RealAnastasia.