48- AN had INDEED a scar in her finger. Volkov himself said that he made this scar in Anastasia's finger with the door of a carriage. AA had the same scar, and a finger nearly stiff, without sensibility. AA opponents always said (reading Pierre Gilliard "La Fausse Anastasie", a book full of mistakes...In fact, he commited much more mistakes than Anna herself) that the girl who caught her finger in a carriage door was...Maria. I don't know if Maria had the same scar in a finger or not. But if we believe Volkov Statement, AN had a scar in her finger, inflicted by himself. ( Harriet Von Rathlef- Peter Kurth- Pierre Gilliard "La Fausse Anastasie"-Decaux-Castelot)
49- AA stated that there was a samovar in Moguilev when she visited there...Gilliard said it was not correct, that in the Tsar Palaces there was not a single samovar. The French historian André Castelot was very surprised: "Not a samovar in a Russian home?" "Its seems incredibly -said Gilliard proudly- But it was like this!"...When the journalist Dominique Auclères started her research in AA's case, she found (Harriet Rathlef had also pointed some of the Gilliard mistakes) that the Swiss professor had simply lied: there were samovars in the Tsar Palaces, and of course, there was one in Moguilev (Pierre Gilliard: "La Fausse Anastasie"-André Castelot-Dominique Auclères)
50-AA said that she (she mean "Anastasia", of course) was Colonel in the Blue Regiment and that she had her uniform like they sisters . Gilliard laugh at her in her book and states: "The youngest Grand Duchess never had a military grade, nor an uniform". Well; he lied again. Dominique Auclères found that Anastasia was indeed Colonel in the Blue Regiment. And doctor Schweitzer emailed me to tell me that there was an exhibition in Virginia, where the Anastasia's Colonel Uniform was shown. So AA didn't lie. Gilliard did. (Pierre Gilliard-Dominique Auclères)
51-Gilliard handled the investigators who helped him in his researchs about AA only FIVE photos of Grand Duchess Anastasia, and not very clear ones. Harriet Rathlef found out that he really provided FOUR photos of AN, for the last one was a Grand Duchess Olga's photo (Anastasia's elder sister) (Harriet Von Rathlef)
52- Pierre Gilliard claimed to have "burned" all the documents proving that AA wasn't AN. Why? Was him unsure of his statesments? (Peter Kurth-Dominique Auclères- James Blair Lovell)
53- The Imperial family in exile, payed too much attention to this claimant. They make war to her and published a document denying her as a Romanov. If it was not her. Why the bothered in such a way? Other claimants were alone in their personals "fight for identity". There were many Alexei in the USA's and anyone pay attention to them in "The Family". Other Anastasias surfaced after and before AA. Nobody bothered to fight againts them. They simply let them saying "I'm a Romanov". And you may notice that we are mainly discussing AA in the "Survivors" Forum...Even after the DNA results. Again. Why? (As personal reflection, you may, of course, delete this)
RealAnastasia.
More to come! 
These quotes are what interests the poster who think AA was GD Anastasia.
This is a little over half of the 101.
This is what this topic is about. You don't have to agree with it. You don't have to like it, but this is a topic set up by Penny Wilson when she was a member of our forum. Of course, you can give your opinion about it since that is what has occured although the discussion was set up under another thread and not followed by many of us.
I do not believe AA was GD Anastasia. Nor do I believe we need to tangle up fact with misinformation to prove our case. AGRBear