Frankly, Sissi, finishing Huerta's book, I didn't know what to believe... But, now, I'm reading Castelot's "Madame Royale", and it seems Huerta relies a lot on Castelot's biography of Marie-Thérèse Charlotte's childhood. For instance, a mistake that amazed me (Valmont for Vermond, queen's obstetrician) in Huerta's book surely comes from Castelot's one.
Mistakes and copying must make readers suspicious, musn't they ?
Furthermore, I found pictures very resembling Marie-Antoinette on this topic. It seems duchess d'Angoulème really looked like her mother ! Same grace and carnation, whatever written descriptions may argue !
I'm still worried about scriptures and behaviour. So many people describe duchess d'Angoulème as a clumpsy person...
You know, I think people need daydreams. They prefer to imagine Charles or Charlotte spending a peaceful life somewhere in space than to face the truth. Itsn't it horrible to admit a little boy was left on is own dying like a dog in a stinking cell ?
Furthermore, french royalists may be attached to these allegued Louis XVII ? There are families directly concerned, and descendance !