I don't claim one view and then privately tell the FA that I don't actually believe that which I posted - then continue the pretence on the chat!
Did you miss the last 5 pages of posts?
Do you -Michael G- have any information on this topic?
I wrote FA that I did not think there was "a switch" in a private PM. Remember, everyone, this was a private PM. I explained that I didn't believe in the switch because of all the great information provided by Helen and others but I'd like to speculate if it was possible. The reason why I'm wondering if it is possible is because I am starting to wonder if AA was FS. If they were two different people, then something is wrong with the DNA / mtDNA which would have to be a "switch" which the FA had told us. It was he I quoted the FA. Remember?
I really didn't say anything different than what I've said on my posts. Therefore, it should not have been a surprise, accept, maybe to those who didn't believe me after all of these posts. And, that seems to be the case since it's the same handful of people who are having a hard time and calling "foul" when there isn't any. Of course, there are a couple of acceptions because there are people are relatively new to these threads and may have misunderstood my intentions.
It is not in my power to understand why a handful of posters tried and continue to make it appear that I was trying to fool people. It is these same posters who were trying to convince people that I believed in "a switch". Anyone can go back and read my 3800 some posts and see for themselves. And, most of my posts have sources where people can go and read the information for themselves and make up their own minds. Unlike some posters,
I'm not afraid of contradictions and this constant stream of post directed at me instead of the topic.
Quite frankly, I and most people are finding my having to make replies to all these personal posts as boring. Unlike you, r. I've not blocked you from sending me PMs so please let's keep this to PMs.
AGRBear
