Sorry if this has already been discussed, but this board is crazy with its 1 million posting threads and I can't be bothered to read through them all.
One thing that has always struck me as odd is that AA claimed she was AN before the bones were ever found.
COINCIDENTALLY, the bones of one of the grand duchesses and Alexei were missing, giving AA an even stronger claim to being AN before the DNA results came out and proved she wasn't.
Don't you think it's a bit weird that AA decided to pretend she was AN and then lo and behold AN's bones were missing from the grave? (Of course, that's if you believe they are AN's bones that are missing, which I do, and which I believe is the scientific consensus, but I may be wrong on that). I always found that an odd coincidence. ?!?
But then, AA never mentioned Alexei surviving or escaping. If the reason some people believe AA was AN is because of the missing bones, how do they explain the absence of Alexei? They can't BOTH have escaped without notice. And if they DID, which would explain the absence of both sets of bones neatly, why didn't AA ever mention it? She would surely have escaped with her brother. Obviously because it never happened, but you know...just being provocative. This board needs a new discussion.
Any thoughts on the matter??
Rachel
xx