Thank you. (I cannot use your name because I do not know the Cyrillic alphabet. Excuse me.)
I appreciate your explanation, and also the link you kindly provided to heraldist Velde's explanation- which is very interesting, detailed and fascinating to read through the historical periods in French history.
The questions/comments I ask next are made with respect to everyone in these families, currently living or not, including Louis Alphonse's immediate family members who tragically died in the 1980s.
My follow up questions are (for anyone to respond)
Prior to these twin boys born in 2010, have these titles been used "legally" by anyone, Duc de Bourgogne after 1761 to 2010, and Duc de Berry after 1820 to 2010?
Are the legalities of these titles why Louis d"Orleans (1773 -1850) King of the French from 1830 to 1848 and head of the Junior Orleans branch (this is what I had always thought it was called) of the French royal family, did not give titles to his several sons born between 1810 and 1824 the Senior French branch of the Bourbon dynasty had been using prior to 1789? If I am wrong and these titles have been used- please correct me.
For example, Louis Alphonse's title Anjou, and those he has designated for his sons born in 2010; I do not believe these have been used for many, many years. Another example-wasn't Louis XVII the Duc de Normandy from 1785 to 1793 and this title of the last French Bourbon son born prior to 1789 has not been used since?
Could any grandsons, great grandsons, etc. of King Juan Carlos of Spain descended through his son also be given these titles if someone currently alive is not using them? It seems to me they could, considering Louis Alphonse's title and those given to his twin sons.
I am not trying to create a debate here- (instead, a discussion) but I believe there are those who may consider Louis Alphonse, Duc de Anjou (interesting this was also the title of the first French born Bourbon King of Spain in 1700) a member of the Spanish royal family (descended from Phillip V up to Alphonso XIII as is King Juan Carlos- if I am wrong please correct me) and not of the deposed French royal family. Or, there are those, despite the renunciation by Phillip in 1700 to the French throne, who may consider the entire Spanish royal family (since the Senior French branch descended from Phillip's older brother- Louis, Duc de Bourgogne- died out out in 1883) also the deposed Senior French royal family as they are all descended from Louis XIV through his second grandson Phillip V while the Orleans branch are descended first from Louis XIV's younger brother. (I know they are also descended from Louis XIV through his legitimized daughter in the next generation.)
If anyone is asking what point I am trying to make here-
I am wondering how these possible differing (legal) opinions regarding persons being considered descendants of French and/or Spanish (from French) Bourbon Royalty relates to the potential legalities of these ancient and revered titles being used in the 21st century.