Can someone tell me who actually decided that Charles should marry Camilla?
Did Charles himself insist on the marriage, thus making her future Queen Consort - or were there outside pressures (namely from the Queen or others) who pushed for it, regarding this preferable to Charles maintaining his mistress behind the scenes?
The Duchess of Cornwall has always appeared discreet and low-key, particularly since 2005. Is this because she has been thrust into a role she didn't truly want or because of advice from the palace to tread carefully in the early days to test the waters, so to speak?
Exactly Grace,she has not set a foot wrong.She has risen way above expectations,and will do so again once Queen,
regardless what some retired queens here say,or think they know,except they love to hear themselves and talk as if
they sleep next door to the couple.They know nada.Charles already made his choice for Queen...
Oh and please,get off it with comparing presidents with who knows who.
We do not care,this is Great Britain and it is a Monarchy,nothing compares to that.
We are talking Charles and Camilla here, a great couple and no doubt they will do a fine job.
There were worries on E VII after Victoria,but even he turned out to be a whale of a King.Nice that E II has the longivity she has,
but her subjects and moreover the rags they love to read don't know which way to turn,le peuple never does till the last moment
and then join the one who won.The vox populi and all the referenda and hypes created by them are nothing,they mean nothing,
at all.Not to anyone with more then two grey cells in its head.Its populist junk I will kick around as often as I have to and can.
And on costs,it still generates more,much more,then it will ever cost.This constant blabbering on a buck says a lot on what sort of people do that.
Not that anyone had a sandwich or big mac less tho,most still consume like there's no tomorrow.So that issue is complete nonsense.