Ok, I simply must ask.
What with all this absolutely marvelous discussion of the interiors, how accurate were the depictions in the film N&A ?
for that matter, even in Fall of Eagles?
Were the set designers fairly spot-on?
Cheers,
Robert
Hey Bobby-
I have the set plans from "N/A" and some photos taken as tests, so as to general thoughts on this: the only things really copied were sort of thematic-i.e., A's Boudoir, N's study, the bedroom with twin brass beds and walls hung with icons. No attempt was made to match up colors, papers, carpets, etc. It was more a "feel" of the Alexander Palace they went for. So you had, for example, elements of things-like a chaise-longue in the boudoir, and walls hung in a mauve floral paper (but not striped as it should have been), but no real copying.
"Fall of Eagles" is less successful in this respect in that they only did one "real" room on set mock-up-A's boudoir, and that, being L-shaped with marble columns and gilded bases and capitals, wasn't anything like the real room. Most of the interiors for "FOE" were done at Holkam and Houghton Halls in Norfolk, and at Harewood House in Yorkshire, so they simply relied on what they found there.
Ironically, among the best created sets for a Romanov film were probably those for the wildly inaccurate "Catherine the Great" (1934) and "Rasputin and the Empress"-the latter took great pains to copy things like N's study at the AP, though, again, many of the sets were simplly thrown together to represent what might be found.
Greg King