The difference is I don't claim to be fair to both sides, but it seemed you did claim that, though it's not true. Talk about repetitive, you just keep saying the same things over and over, the old stuff that's never going to change, and has already been proven to have been wrong. At least I keep coming up with new ideas to fill in the blanks for things we will never find the answers to. If you're only going to quote the same book over and over, you're just chasing your tail.
And I guess FA has already backed down on his ban of the discussion of AA being AN without proof the DNA was wrong.