I really don't think Wallis was suitable for an "HRH", far from it in fact. The fact that she was "allegedly" carrying on with a used car salesman at the same time as seeing the Prince, is rather shocking (I remember getting practically lynched for brinigng this up last time). In my opinion I think the way Edward and Walis harped on about Wallis's HRH was almost unhealthy and there treatment of Queen Mary was to much.
I do think the Royals made the right decision in allowing them to be buried together though
I could be wrong but I believe under British Common Law a woman automatically asuumes the rank and tiltle of the the man she marries.
There is no such thing as morganatic marriage under British Common Law.
TampaBay
I believe you are right about that. Wasn't EVIII told when he mentioned having Wallis be called something other than Queen, that there was no such thing as a that. A King's wife is automatically a Queen, so by that reasoning an HRH's wife should automatically be an HRH. As for not being a suitable HRH, if you go by that resoning due to allegely carrying on with the salesman, most of todays RF woulnd't be HRH. I don't see anyone making a rush to take away their HRH.
I believe I read in Ralph Martin's bio, that one of the reasons not making Wallis HRH was with her having been married twice before, that the Royal Family didn't want a divorced HRH running around if she and the Duke divorced, as once an HRH always an HRH. If I'm remembering right and this story is true that certainly was forgotten 50-60 years later with the York/Wales divorces.