Author Topic: DNA Evidence  (Read 81583 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Forum Admin

  • Administrator
  • Velikye Knyaz
  • *****
  • Posts: 4665
  • www.alexanderpalace.org
    • View Profile
    • Alexander Palace Time Machine
Re: DNA Evidence
« Reply #435 on: October 05, 2006, 10:16:20 AM »
Martha Jefferson Hospital is a teaching hospital, used to train doctors. Yes, in teaching hospitals it is common to keep tissue samples of certain cancers and diseases for many years, for use in research and training.  It had nothing to do with who she was, but rather the nature of her illness.  Even regular hospitals will keep pathology samples for years for routine re-analysis if need be, so yes your tissue samples are still stored most likely in your hospital. Remember, these are not the entire bits removed, but smaller portions, so they don't take up all that much room.

Alixz

  • Guest
Re: DNA Evidence
« Reply #436 on: October 05, 2006, 06:39:14 PM »
FA - Thank you for your information.  I never thought too much about it until I read Peter Kurth's Anastasia - The Riddle of Anna Anderson.

People always talk about all of the coincidences that surrounded AA, and here is yet another.  Had she not had the operation for the cancer or not had cancer at all, there would probably have been no DNA to use for comparison.

Now that is something no one could foresee.  No matter how many people disbelieved her story, not one of them could have imagined DNA profiling as a way to confirm or deny someone's identity.

Offline Forum Admin

  • Administrator
  • Velikye Knyaz
  • *****
  • Posts: 4665
  • www.alexanderpalace.org
    • View Profile
    • Alexander Palace Time Machine
Re: DNA Evidence
« Reply #437 on: October 05, 2006, 09:10:19 PM »
Alixz,
Now add to the fact that the very FIRST time mtDNA identification was done, was the AA sample!! Dr. Gill decided it would be a good test case for his first try! There was simply NO WAY for anyone to know how it would turn out, since the sequences had never been done before.

J_Kendrick

  • Guest
Re: DNA Evidence
« Reply #438 on: October 05, 2006, 10:48:30 PM »
Alixz,
Now add to the fact that the very FIRST time mtDNA identification was done, was the AA sample!! Dr. Gill decided it would be a good test case for his first try! There was simply NO WAY for anyone to know how it would turn out, since the sequences had never been done before.

Uh...  Just a small point...

Testing of the AA sample was not "the very FIRST time" that mtDNA identification was done.

The first was the match between Philip and Alexandra. :)

Offline Belochka

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 4447
  • City of Peter stand in all your splendor - Pushkin
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Evidence
« Reply #439 on: October 05, 2006, 11:03:31 PM »
It was a worthy beginning for scientific innovation befittingly served against AA's inglorious end!

Margarita
;D


Faces of Russia is now on Facebook!


http://www.searchfoundationinc.org/

Offline Eddie_uk

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 2925
    • View Profile
Re: DNA Evidence
« Reply #440 on: October 06, 2006, 02:19:28 AM »
It was a worthy beginning for scientific innovation befittingly served against AA's inglorious end!

Margarita
;D

Amen!!!!!:):)
Grief is the price we pay for love.

FREE PALESTINE.

Alixz

  • Guest
Re: DNA Evidence
« Reply #441 on: October 06, 2006, 09:19:43 AM »
I am suitably impressed.  True life is always stranger than fiction.     8)