Author Topic: Windsor Jewels Part 5  (Read 191445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

emeraldeyes1969

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #30 on: October 22, 2006, 01:30:35 PM »
I asked Boffer if he could make some changes on Queen Mary's amethyst tiara and here is what he came up with.  An excellent job Boffer!!

http://members2.boardhost.com/royal-jewels/msg/1161457368.html


I have to say that I loooooove the ruby version, although finding such humongous stones might present a problem.  Imagine how valuable that parure would be? 

Offline Eddie_uk

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 2925
    • View Profile
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #31 on: October 22, 2006, 02:01:39 PM »
Apparently Imelda has agreed on an out of coat settlement and it looks likely some jewels will be auctioned.

I agree the Tiara looks odd and rather empty without the pearl drops
:)
Grief is the price we pay for love.

FREE PALESTINE.

Eric_Lowe

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #32 on: October 22, 2006, 08:51:02 PM »
Yes I found it strange without the pearls and emeralds. The empty loops looked really hollow. However Infanta Beatriz did worn her Arquiremarine Tiara (which she inheirted from Ena) without the blue stones and just empty loops at a wedding in Athens during the 60's.  ???

ashdean

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #33 on: October 23, 2006, 03:36:53 AM »
It is very odd without the emerald or pearl drops...I wonder if the Queen as ever even thought of adding another set of stones..despite her tiara spree in the 1970's she seems to be relatively uninovative in that way....

boffer

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #34 on: October 23, 2006, 04:25:23 AM »
I wonder if any one else agrees that this tiara wouldnt look bad, if just the central loop had a diamond in it .... and the rest are empty.

I happen to really like it; it draws the eyes to the diamond, which could be a good way of displaying one of the cullinans.


Eric_Lowe

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #35 on: October 23, 2006, 04:26:42 AM »
I think the only diamond loops design may give the tiara a modern look ?  ???

basilforever

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #36 on: October 23, 2006, 12:50:55 PM »
I like the Vladimir tiara empty. It does look quite refreshing and more modern. But for the sheer grandness and beauty of it I love it with the pearl drops the best.  :)



Click on the picture for a very big view.  :P

boffer

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #37 on: October 23, 2006, 02:10:24 PM »
Thank you so much for the picture. Do you happen to have a "very big" picture of the rest of that picture? (ie. her necklace and earrings)?


emeraldeyes1969

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #38 on: October 23, 2006, 03:21:06 PM »
Ho-leee that was humongous!

Is there a discoloured pearl drop there, or is it just the lighting/shadows?

Eric_Lowe

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #39 on: October 23, 2006, 10:12:33 PM »
I think Camilla would look nice with this tiara (without the drops) since she can show her big hairstyle more.  ;)

basilforever

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #40 on: October 24, 2006, 07:56:48 AM »
Thank you so much for the picture. Do you happen to have a "very big" picture of the rest of that picture? (ie. her necklace and earrings)?



Sure Boffer, I have tonnes.  :D

I will supply a couple.

Hmmm, I don't think Camilla will be wearing this tiara any time soon, but I suppose she could eventually. I don't know if it is a discoloured pearl drop? Maybe, but it doesn't detract from the whole piece anyway.

The Queen's choice of jewelry on these state visits was very impressive.





From the other state dinner:





emeraldeyes1969

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #41 on: October 25, 2006, 08:46:35 AM »
The Nizam of Hyderabad necklace really has to be one of my favourites.  It is so regal looking, and despite being one of the workhorses of HM's collection, it always looks fresh to me.  The desgin is lovely, even though it is really quite unusual when you look closely.  I think I read somewhere that the lower pendant is detachable, but I can't recall ever having seen HM wearing it without all the pieces.  Anyone else?


boffer

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #42 on: October 25, 2006, 12:56:09 PM »
I have never seen Her Majesty wear this without the pendant, but then again Her Majesty has never really altered her jewelery, certainly not the degrees of her grandmother. I think it might look rather odd without the pendant; but it ceretainly is a lovely necklace; i had the pleasure of seeing it this summer at the exhibiton at Buckingham Palace, and i must confess i spent longer looking at the jewels then any other part of the palace.

boffer

  • Guest
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #43 on: October 25, 2006, 03:19:07 PM »
I recently thought i would see what the Vladimir Tiara looks like with a single diamond (Cullinan III) in the central loop. I happen to really like it - what are other people opinions?




Offline Eddie_uk

  • Velikye Knyaz
  • ****
  • Posts: 2925
    • View Profile
Re: Windsor Jewels Part 5
« Reply #44 on: October 25, 2006, 03:21:59 PM »
Great art work boffer! :)

I think it resembles something phallic like  ???
Grief is the price we pay for love.

FREE PALESTINE.