What is the best way to resolve the Tammet claim?

[Bev]

So there are two Wink Incs' in Scottsdale owned by a person named Wink?  And both are public relations co.'s?  Because you said a small Scottsdale PR firm, which is what I googled and found Wink Inc owned by Wink Blair with Richard Sutz as vp.

An acknowledgement is just a thanks, it isn't a statement of services rendered, nor is it a contractual obligation and it can mean anything from thanks for your interest to thanks for the money to thanks for being there, which I noticed you have done on your website. 

You know, Mr. Kendrick, I think that in your own best interest, you might want to take another look at whatever arrangement you have with this pr firm, because it appears that these people have so many irons in the fire, that perhaps your deal isn't on the front burner, and in fact, may have fallen by the wayside.  If they haven't done anything to promote this deal in the last ten years, I think I'd take the hint and find an agent familiar with shopping book deals and film rights.

[Forum Admin]

But, then, Bev, can you really rely on someone with a vested financial interest in the outcome to be objective and impartial about the facts? I wouldn't, and  I see a conflict of interest there, especially for a "journalist"...just my personal opinion of course.

Rob

[Bev]

I don't have any objections to people making money, what I object to is blaming Dr. Gill because Kendrick's friends failed to come up with the financing.  It does surprise me that an independent journalist doesn't have an agent.  Depending on some local pr firm to shop your book deal isn't very smart - they don't have the expertise.  In my opinion, someone is giving Kendrick a snow job and I don't think it's Gill and Ivanov, if you catch my drift...(and I'm sure you do.)

[J_Kendrick]

You know, Mr. Kendrick, I think that in your own best interest, you might want to take another look at whatever arrangement you have with this pr firm, because it appears that these people have so many irons in the fire, that perhaps your deal isn't on the front burner, and in fact, may have fallen by the wayside.  If they haven't done anything to promote this deal in the last ten years, I think I'd take the hint and find an agent familiar with shopping book deals and film rights.

You still don't get it. 

The arrangement was made in late 1992 between Dr. Peter Gill, Dr. Pavel Ivanov, and Wink Inc. V-P Richard Sutz. 
I have no personal involvement in this matter.  I am only the messenger who is telling you that this arrangement had existed.

It is Dr. Peter Gill, Dr. Pavel Ivanov, and Wink Inc. v-p Richard Sutz who had made the arrangement and who are now obliged to explain the details of that same arrangement.

Go directly to the source... Dr. Peter Gill and Dr. Pavel Ivanov.  They are the ones who must now explain themselves.

Do not take out your frustrations on the messenger.

[Bev]

What frustration?  I don't have a dog in this hunt, I was merely giving you a little professional advice.  Personally, I wouldn't touch this story with a ten foot pole.

[J_Kendrick]

What frustration?  I don't have a dog in this hunt, I was merely giving you a little professional advice.  Personally, I wouldn't touch this story with a ten foot pole.

That's because you clearly know nothing about the evidence in this case.  Please keep your advice to yourself, until you actually do know all of that same evidence in full detail.

[Bev]

No, it's because it's silly.  Even sillier than Anna Anderson's claim.  It never fails to amaze me, that the very people taken in by con artists, are the people most willing to defend them.  People are too embarrassed to admit they've been taken in these kinds of scams.

[skirt]

It would be too embarrassing to ask anyone to consider testing the dna of this man.  The story is so ludicrous, so meritless, that it calls into question the intelligence of anyone who is credulous enough to believe it.

ouch!
That is so harsh!
People are allowed to have opinions whether you agree with them or not right?
Is it necessary to insult ones' intelligence because of a belief?
I have heard a few ludicrous stories before too..the earth is round... Immaculate Conception...crop circles...etc 
Believing in something that you dont need to prove is called faith- Thankfully I live in a country that allows everyone to believe and think whatever they like, providing they are not hurting anyone else.  Its also respect for one another.

It doesnt sound like Mr.Kendrick is asking anyone for money or trying to hurt anyone on this forum by posting his opinions (opinions that he appears to have researched and spend alot of time on - whether its true or not he has obviously worked hard on what he believes to be the truth)
I have been visiting here for awhile now, and frankly I am shocked by the manner that 'many' reply to his posts.
Is it wrong to just agree to disagree without the harsh insults (con artist?) and sarcasm?
Isn't everyone entitled to have a personal opinion without being condemned and insulted for it?
Nothing personal Bev- there are many quotes I could've used, Margerita (sp?) and several others I could've quoted as well.
All points are acknowledged,and debate is healthy for many reasons- but as the saying goes, if you dont have anything nice to say...
play fair and be kind.

Skirt

[Belochka]

I have been visiting here for awhile now, and frankly I am shocked by the manner that 'many' reply to his posts.
Is it wrong to just agree to disagree without the harsh insults (con artist?) and sarcasm?
Isn't everyone entitled to have a personal opinion without being condemned and insulted for it?
... All points are acknowledged,and debate is healthy for many reasons- but as the saying goes, if you dont have anything nice to say...
play fair and be kind.

There is nothing nice to say about about pretenders. If you are suggesting that we have to treat Kendrick's delusions regarding this tiresome case nicely, then you are respectfuly mistaken.

Nothing personal Bev- there are many quotes I could've used, Margerita (sp?) and several others I could've quoted as well.

Skirt

Please extend the courtesy of providing the correct spelling when you refer to specific posters. May I suggest that you refrain from berating other poster on this thread. It adds nothing to the course of discussion.

Thank you.

Margarita

[skirt]

If you dont believe it then why even bother responding or reading these threads?
I wouldn't dare suggest anything to YOU,
respect and kindness seems to be in short supply at times.. but I'll leave that as that...
I was simply stating that after reading reading through this post it became TIRESOME to hear you and others who disagree with Mr.Kendricks theory, being so completely rude. Have you concidered its not the "theory" that you are not treating nicely?
I apologise for incorrectly spelling your name- but glad that you knew that it was directed towards yourself.
As a matter of fact, the course of this discussion was concerning the Tammet case, and is not a
discussion when folks like yourselves dont allow it to be a discussed fairly by being inconciderate and rude with regards to others opinions.

Margarita says:

May I suggest that you refrain from berating other poster on this thread. It adds nothing to the course of discussion.

For the enjoyment of others - take your own advice.

Thank YOU

Skirt
XOXO